10/03/2016 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Allain, to grant the following variance as written for 16-7076; Mohammed Musleh; 4603 Porter Road, 1. A variance for a driveway in an insufficient side yard; code requires a side yard of no less than 15 feet where a driveway is proposed, side yard is less than 15 feet, Section 1135.07(a). Motion passed 5-0. 16-7094; Sean McKay; 25112 Gessner Road Representative: Lee McKay, brother of owner, 3737 Walter Road, North Olmsted, OH Proposal consists of a private garage. The property is zoned One Family Residence C. The following variances are requested: 1. A 2-1/2 in. variance for side yard setback; code requires 5 ft., application shows 4 ft. 9-1/2 in., Section 1135.02(c)(2). 2. An 8 in. variance for the height of the garage; code permits 15 ft., applicant shows 15 ft. 8 in., Section 1135.02(c)(1). 3. An 82 sq. ft. variance for a garage over 750 sq. ft.; code permits 750 sq. ft., applicant shows 832 sq. ft., Section 1135.02(c)(1). Mr. Aspery stated that the applicant is requesting variances pertaining to the construction of a new detached garage to the northeast of the existing house. Variances are requested regarding side yard setback, the height of the structure, and the area of the structure. Mr. McKay stated that the current garage is in poor condition and the owner would like to install a larger garage with a higher ceiling to accommodate his large truck and hide them from view of the neighbors. He is willing to move the garage to remove the first variance required. Ms. Meredith clarified that the proposed garage would use a new foundation. The extra height is needed to clear the headers of the truck which has larger tires and suspension installed. Mr. McKay stated that the owner owned the truck prior to purchasing the home. The primary reason for the request for the additional square footage is to accommodate the longer truck length. A 10-foot overhead door would be installed. Currently the truck is for recreational purposes, but in the future, the owner would like to install ladders for his side job. Mr. Papotto asked if the trailer is used for work and would be stored inside. The owner works in the construction industry and the truck is not owned by a company. Ms. Meredith pointed out that the lot behind the property would not be affected by a larger garage. It would be good for storage and safety of the owner's property. Mr. Papotto stated that the length requested is not unreasonable due to the length of a Ford F-250 truck and to accommodate a tool bench. Mr. Papotto suggested splitting the variances and he did not have an issue with the height variance. Mr. Allain was concerned that the variance would allow for future business use of the property if it is granted. He also added that the vehicle was purchased prior to the property, therefore the owner created the hardship for himsel£ 1VIs. Sabo added that the vehicle was modified to increase the height which requires a bigger garage, even though the modifications are not necessary to use the vehicle, Mr. Allain agreed. Mr. Raig pointed out that the proposed garage would only be three feet longer than the current gaxage. Ms. Meredith said it is not uncommon for construction workers to have side jobs but she did not believe the garage