My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/11/2016 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2016
>
2016 Landmarks Commission
>
01/11/2016 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:45:46 PM
Creation date
1/24/2019 8:45:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2016
Board Name
Landmarks Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/11/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
due to the deterioration of the bricks. Mr. Dubowski, Mr. Neville, and Mr. Morse agreed that <br />they would like to see scalloped siding where there is currently scalloped siding. Mr. Wasniak <br />stated that the scalloped siding would be the same width as the rest of the siding, 5 inches, to <br />match closely to the existing front fagade siding. Mr. Neville stated he wouldn't like to see the <br />house covered in vinyl siding because it changes the character of the house too much. A <br />Victorian era house would not have man-made material. Discussion occurred on when the house <br />was built, 1880s or 1908. Discussion occurred over the cost of painting the house and using <br />alternate types of paint that would last longer than normal exterior paint. Mr. Morse suggested <br />Mr. Wasniak table the case so the members may look at Secretary of the Interior guidelines to <br />see if the change is appropriate for the district. Mr. Dubowski reiterated he dislikes the vinyl <br />siding on the chimney with the rest of the house, and he believed it will look too modern. Mr. <br />Morse agreed with leaving the vinyl siding off the chimney. Mr. Neville asked all commissioners <br />to look at the house before the next meeting. <br />Ms. Schuler moved, seconded by Mr. Morse, to table CMS15-5017: James Wasniak; 26487 <br />Butternut Ridge Road for a certificate of appropriateness to replace existing siding, which <br />passed 5-0. <br />27111 Butternut Ridge Road <br />Stone and wood landscape wall <br />Ms. Wenger stated that according to the City Engineer, the wall appears to be 12 inches behind <br />the sidewalk, therefore outside of the right of way. It appears to be a subdivision identification <br />sign likely installed when the subdivision was built. The subdivision plat doesn't specifically <br />identify the wall. The City Engineer would prefer that the wall be removed, which may aid in <br />visibility in the intersection. Ms. Wenger stated that the Police Chief did not have any reports of <br />accidents at the intersection due to poor visibility. Ms. Wenger stated that the Service Foreman <br />went to the site to take pictures and while there noticed that there may be underground removal <br />required to take out the wall and footer. While looking at the pins, the Service Foreman found a <br />pin on the side of the wall closest to the street, supporting the City Engineer's comments. The <br />survey the homeowner had showed an old right of way and the boundary lines have possibly <br />moved. However, Ms. Wenger has been unable to find the original document. Mr. Dubelko <br />stated that the descriptions in the deed may show a change in right of way due to the wording. He <br />also thought the wall should come down due to having no historical significance due to the fact <br />that the subdivision was never finished as it was intended to be built with gas street lights and a <br />recreation area. Mr. Neville doesn't believe the material would have any historic value outside of <br />its current context. Mr. Morse was concerned about what was originally on the wall. Mr. <br />Dubelko described how the subdivision was done in 3 phases and some other history of the <br />subdivision. Mr. Morse stated that the elements that tie the wall to the street are gone. Also, the <br />traffic visibility isn't a concern because during school hours, left hand turns are not allowed. Ms. <br />Wenger stated that any future street projects the City would do on Butternut Ridge may affect the <br />wall if it was attempted to be preserved. Mr. Dubelko asked if the current residents of the <br />Beverly Hills subdivision want the wall. Ms. Schuler stated the wall is unsightly and is not <br />necessarily historic. Discussion occurred over the possible future Butternut Ridge Road <br />reconstruction projects. Mr. Morse didn't think the wall adds anything to the district but it could <br />be addressed as part of the Butternut Ridge road improvement plan. Ms. Wenger stated that there
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.