Laserfiche WebLink
due to the deterioration of the bricks. Mr. Dubowski, Mr. Neville, and Mr. Morse agreed that <br />they would like to see scalloped siding where there is currently scalloped siding. Mr. Wasniak <br />stated that the scalloped siding would be the same width as the rest of the siding, 5 inches, to <br />match closely to the existing front fagade siding. Mr. Neville stated he wouldn't like to see the <br />house covered in vinyl siding because it changes the character of the house too much. A <br />Victorian era house would not have man-made material. Discussion occurred on when the house <br />was built, 1880s or 1908. Discussion occurred over the cost of painting the house and using <br />alternate types of paint that would last longer than normal exterior paint. Mr. Morse suggested <br />Mr. Wasniak table the case so the members may look at Secretary of the Interior guidelines to <br />see if the change is appropriate for the district. Mr. Dubowski reiterated he dislikes the vinyl <br />siding on the chimney with the rest of the house, and he believed it will look too modern. Mr. <br />Morse agreed with leaving the vinyl siding off the chimney. Mr. Neville asked all commissioners <br />to look at the house before the next meeting. <br />Ms. Schuler moved, seconded by Mr. Morse, to table CMS15-5017: James Wasniak; 26487 <br />Butternut Ridge Road for a certificate of appropriateness to replace existing siding, which <br />passed 5-0. <br />27111 Butternut Ridge Road <br />Stone and wood landscape wall <br />Ms. Wenger stated that according to the City Engineer, the wall appears to be 12 inches behind <br />the sidewalk, therefore outside of the right of way. It appears to be a subdivision identification <br />sign likely installed when the subdivision was built. The subdivision plat doesn't specifically <br />identify the wall. The City Engineer would prefer that the wall be removed, which may aid in <br />visibility in the intersection. Ms. Wenger stated that the Police Chief did not have any reports of <br />accidents at the intersection due to poor visibility. Ms. Wenger stated that the Service Foreman <br />went to the site to take pictures and while there noticed that there may be underground removal <br />required to take out the wall and footer. While looking at the pins, the Service Foreman found a <br />pin on the side of the wall closest to the street, supporting the City Engineer's comments. The <br />survey the homeowner had showed an old right of way and the boundary lines have possibly <br />moved. However, Ms. Wenger has been unable to find the original document. Mr. Dubelko <br />stated that the descriptions in the deed may show a change in right of way due to the wording. He <br />also thought the wall should come down due to having no historical significance due to the fact <br />that the subdivision was never finished as it was intended to be built with gas street lights and a <br />recreation area. Mr. Neville doesn't believe the material would have any historic value outside of <br />its current context. Mr. Morse was concerned about what was originally on the wall. Mr. <br />Dubelko described how the subdivision was done in 3 phases and some other history of the <br />subdivision. Mr. Morse stated that the elements that tie the wall to the street are gone. Also, the <br />traffic visibility isn't a concern because during school hours, left hand turns are not allowed. Ms. <br />Wenger stated that any future street projects the City would do on Butternut Ridge may affect the <br />wall if it was attempted to be preserved. Mr. Dubelko asked if the current residents of the <br />Beverly Hills subdivision want the wall. Ms. Schuler stated the wall is unsightly and is not <br />necessarily historic. Discussion occurred over the possible future Butternut Ridge Road <br />reconstruction projects. Mr. Morse didn't think the wall adds anything to the district but it could <br />be addressed as part of the Butternut Ridge road improvement plan. Ms. Wenger stated that there