Laserfiche WebLink
believed that a 1915 or older aboveground feature should exist in order to qualify for the <br />Centennial Home program. But this home has a lot of history to tell and may qualify for <br />Landmark designation. Mr. Neville agreed that the home was not standing in the City's <br />centennial year. Mr. Schumann suggested the applicant withdraw the application and the <br />commission can look further into Landmark status; Ms. Lang agreed to withdraw her Centennial <br />Home program application in order to pursue Landmark status. <br />26747 Butternut Ridge Road <br />Mr. Neville and Mr. Morse met with the applicant the previous month to discuss the application. <br />Mr. Neville stated that the home is clearly from around the turn of the century and the Historic <br />Inventory shows that it was built before 1915. He added that the shingles have been added since <br />the home was built, but most of the rest of the house is original. Mr. Morse believed that the tax <br />records prove the home meets the standards for the program. <br />Mr. Morse moved, seconded by Mr. Schumann, to approve the Centennial Home certificate <br />for 26747 Butternut Ridge Road, motion passed 5-0. <br />2896 Clague Road <br />Mr. Neville read Mr. Dubelko's email to Ms. Rambo-Ackerman dated June 5, 2017 into the <br />record. Mr. Neville stated that the large craftsman-style porch covers up a vernacular-style home, <br />indicating that the home is old enough for the program. There is some indication that the home <br />may date back to 1835, but they are unsure of the exact date. Mr. Neville did not see a reason to <br />deny the Centennial Home certificate, but they should continue to pursue the exact build date. <br />Mr. Schumann moved, seconded by Mr. Morse, to approve the Centennial Home certificate <br />for 2896 Clague Roarl, motion passed 5-0. <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br />Committee Work Updates <br />Records <br />Ms. Rambo-Ackerman asked the Commission what they wanted to do with the traffic report <br />studies that Mr. Limpert and Mr. Dubelko wanted to keep from the Engineering files. Mr. <br />Limpert stated that he tried to keep the significant traffic studies that may have some historically <br />significant information, including accident overlays and traffic counts. Mr. Limpert believed the <br />reports should be kept to understand how the city evolved over the years. He asked to look at the <br />files further prior to the next meeting before making a determination. Ms. Schuler and Mr. Morse <br />would like a short inventory of the Commission's file cabinet listed on the website. <br />Historic Preservation Plan <br />Ms. Schuler stated that she and Mr. Morse had begun looking at the plan to update it, but they <br />have not created an updated draft. Mr. Aspery said he would reach out to them to work on the <br />plan. Mr. Morse was concerned that the Ohio Historic Inventory does not match the list of <br />historically marked homes and some have since been razed. Ms. Wenger said the Commission <br />could include updating the inventory as an action item in the historic preservation plan.