09/11/2017 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

applicant shows 10; Section 1163.28(A). B5. A variance permitting two wall signs to extend closer than 12 in. to the top edge of a wall; code requires a minimum distance of 12 in. from the top of a sign to the top of the wall to which it is attached, applicant shows sign projection above the wall.; Section 1163.28(B). Note Swenson's Main Sign on Elevation A. B6. A 2.23 ft. height variance for 1 wall sign; code allows a maximum height of 4 ft., applicant shows 6.23 ft.; Section 1163.28(C). Note Swenson's Main Sign on Elevation A. B7. A 1.5 ft. height variance for 2 wall signs; code allows a maximum height of 4 ft., applicant shows 5.5 ft.; Section 1163.28(C). Note Proposed Menu Board signs on Elevations B and C. B8. A 1 ft. height variance for 2 wall signs; code allows a maximum height of 4 ft., applicant shows 5 ft.; Section 1163.28(C). Note Limited Time Offer signs on Elevations B and C. B9. A variance permitting two wall signs less than 2 ft. apart; code requires wall signs to be no closer than 2 ft. to any other sign, applicant shows signs less than 2 ft. apart; Section 1163.28(D). Note Curbside Dining and Menu Board signs on Elevation C. Mr. Aspery stated that the applicant is proposing a number of variances for Swenson's Drive-In, a new drive-in restaurant proposed at 27175 Lorain Road. Variances A1 through A7 address the required front building setback, street lawn and buffer zone depths, light fixture mounting height in relation to pole location, and the dumpster enclosure location. Variances B1 through B9 address signage, including total building sign area, ground and wall sign quantity, wall sign height and location, and ground sign sight triangle location. Mr. Flowers reviewed the history of Swensons, a full-service drive-in restaurant. The property location is peculiar and the applicants faced many challenges trying to design a project for the space. Parking spaces were decreased from 72 to 66 spaces and employees would be required to park off-site. Mr. Cash added that the building is in the center of the property and they could not decrease parking spaces more since there would be no interior seating. The applicants tried to balance the setback requirements and buffering while looking at other walls and landscaping options. Ms. Carlson pointed out that all messaging and signage would be on the outside of the building due to the nature of the business. The overall signage has been scaled back and the applicant was concerned about decreasing it further and negatively impacting brand recognition. Ms. Lieber said this is the first proposal going before the BZBA under the new zoning update and the case will go to the Planning and Design Commission after variances are determined. The required setbacks are challenging for corner lots and properties in the B-3 General Business district have the greatest requirements. There have been many discussions with the applicants and they have done a good job of addressing the City's concerns. She also pointed out that the allowable signage is based on building frontage and since the building is small, it greatly limits the allowed amount of signage. Mr. Allain clarified that the variances would be approved conditioned on the approval of the lot consolidation. Mr. Papotto clarified with the applicants that the buffering along the northeast property line would go up to the adjacent building due to the location of the property lines. Ms. Carlson pointed out that the back fence would be brick pillars with wood fencing to help protect the existing trees and it would extend across the rear property line. Mr. Flowers added that the brick is the same brick used at the new High School/Middle School complex. Mr. Allain believed the applicants did a nice job trying to make everything fit onto the unique lot. One of