Laserfiche WebLink
stored. Mr. Papotto did not have a problem with the variance because her property is close to the <br />next level of the schedule, Mr. Allain agreed. <br />Mr. Mackey moved, seconded by Mr. Papotto, to approve the following variance for 18- <br />10929; Christine Emry; 28406 Douglas Drive: <br />1. An 18 sq. ft. variances for size of an accessory structure; code permits 150 sq. ft., <br />applicant shows 168 sq. ft., Section 1135.02(c)(2). <br />Motion passed 3-0. <br />18-10974; Mukhammad Kamalov; 27478 Cottonwood Trail <br />Representatives: Ravsham Kamalov, nephew, 1476 Hopkins Ave, Lakewood, OH; Mukhammad <br />Kamalov, owner; Elaine Jezior, 27571 Laurell Lane <br />Proposal consists of a new accessory structure. Property is zoned A-One Family Residence. Lot <br />is 13,363 square feet. <br />The following variances are requested: <br />1. A 10 sq. ft. variance for size of an accessory structure; code permits 150 sq. ft., applicant <br />shows 160 sq. ft., Section 1135.02(c). <br />2. A 4 in. variance for height of an accessory structure; code permits 12 ft., applicant shows 12 <br />ft. 4 in., Section 1135.02(c). <br />Note: Second accessory structure will be removed when new structure is built. <br />Mr. Aspery said the applicant is proposing to finish constructing a 10 foot by 16 foot shed in <br />their rear yard that was started before a permit was pulled. Code permits a maximum accessory <br />storage building area of 150 square feet and the applicant's proposed shed totals 160 square feet, <br />therefore requiring a variance of 10 square feet. The applicant's property is recorded as 13,363 <br />square feet; code allows 150 square feet for a lot size up to 21,779 square feet, amounting to a <br />difference of 8,436 square feet before the next tier is reached in the schedule. The applicant is <br />also requesting a height variance, as the proposed shed currently exceeds the 12 foot maximum <br />allowable height for an accessory structure by 4 inches. Mr. Kamalov stated that the existing <br />shed is small and the garage is not big enough to store all of the owner's equipment. He did not <br />think the neighbors would be affected by the shed and it would not be connected to the house. <br />Ms. Jezior submitted pictures of the current shed. She stated that the owner started building the <br />shed over the weekend. She was concerned about gutters on the structure and what was being <br />stored in the shed. Mr. Kamalov stated that they do not have gutters on the shed because they <br />were told to stop work since no permit was pulled. <br />Mr. Russell said the existing shed will need to be removed. Mr. Mackey asked if the shed will be <br />used for commercial property, Mr. Kamalov stated that the shed will only have equipment used <br />for residential purposes. Ms. Jezior pointed out that the properties are not that big and she did not <br />think the owner needed a riding mower. Mr. Kamalov stated that he is helping build the structure <br />with his family who has been doing construction for 12 years. Mr. Allain asked if the owner <br />could decrease the height by 4 inches. Mr. Kamalov stated that the roof was already installed. <br />Mr. Allain did not think the variances requested were unreasonable. Mr. Papotto did not have an <br />issue with the proposal, especially since the new shed looks nicer.