05/05/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. A 10-foot variance for an addition within required side setback on a corner lot, (code requ.ires 25 ft, applicant shows 15 ft), section (1135.06 (B)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.05 (C)), (1135.08 (A)), and (1135.06 (B)). Mr. & Mrs. Mate the owners came forwazd to be sworn in and address the request. Mrs. Mate indicated that they would like to add an addition to the back of their for their handica.p son. The addition is lreing added to the bacg of the existing hoffie and would be 2-feet shorter at either ends. By atlowing them to have tfie addition their son would not have to go into a home. Mr. Rymazczyk indicated that the variance requested is quite lazge. The lot is quite small and the coverage is 35% of the backyazd. Boazd members felt the addition was excessive. Mrs. Mate indicated that she would be willing to cut down the size of the addition but they do need a three car garage. Mr. Rymarczyk questioned if fhe applicants had consulted an architect. Mrs. Mate thought that the majority of the homes in the neighborhood had additions as well and did not want to higher an arclutect until the variances were granted. Mr. O'MaHey encouraged the applicazlts to take the Assistant Building Commissianers advice and seek the help of a professional. The applicanfs aze trying fo do whaf they can do on their own. Mrs. Diver indicated that the applicants have to decide whaY their priorities are and work with a professional who can help them and return once they aze ready. W. Kremzar moved to table Joseph & Vickie Mate of 23281 14larion IZoad. M. Diver seconaed the motion, which was unanimously approved. Variances Tabied. 3. Brvan & Janice Tench; 24357 Woodmere Drrve; (WRD 2) Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a pool. The following variance is requested: 1. A 161 square foot variance for swimming pooi in rear yard, (code permits 728 sq ft, applicant shows 889 sq ft(garage, deck 8c pool). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d2)). Mrs. Tench the owner and 1VIr. Fuerst, a neighbor, each came forwazd to be sworn in and address the request. Mrs. Tench indicated that tbey just purchased their home and would I`ke to have a pool in their backyazd. The yard is fenced and an electrician has beexi hired to move the electricallines once a varia.nce is granted. The pool that was purchased is the smallest gool made as the oval and round pools are equal in square footag,e. Mr. Fuerst questioned if the height of the fence must be 6-feet and where the pool equipment wouid be placed. Mrs. Tench indicated that the pool equipment would be under the existing deck and there would be an alarm system on the pool and the only access to the pool would be from the deck. W. Rymazczyk indicated that the pool was to large for the rear yard. W. Kremzar moved to approve Bryan & Janice Tench of 24357 Woodmere Drive their request for variance (1123.12), wluch consists of a pool and that the following variance is granted: 1. A 161 square foot variance for swiarixning pool in rear yazd, (code permits 728 scp fi, applicant shows 889 sq $(garage, deck & pooI). Which is in vioiation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d2)). J. Maloney seconded the motion, wluch was unanimously denied. Variance Denied. Clerks note: Mr. & Mrs. Tench's case was approved for reconsideration at the June 2, 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. 4. Dolores Snellv; 4713 Grace Ave: (WRD 4) Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a house addition. The following variance is requested: 1. A 5 foot variance for a residence located within required front yazd setback, (code requires 50', applicant shows 45'). 2