06/02/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

201, applicant shows 15'). Which is in violation of 90-125, section (1139.07) (table). N. Sergi seconded the motion, evbich vvas unanimously denied. Variance Denied Board members feit that as variance request #4 was tied to the use variance it shouid be tabled. Mr. Rymarczylc advised that the section requiring the variance was not in relation to the use variance as it was for the eoffimercial sec4ion only. Mrs. Sergi felt tlaat following the code would push the parking in the middle of the existing driveway, but Planning Commission wants the driveway removed. J. Maloney moved to grpnt C& C Ikealty of 27932 Lorain Road tfieir reqmest for variance (1123.12), which consists of site development and that the following variance is granted: #4). A 10 foot variance for partsing setback along north 125 faot commercial property iine, (code requires 20', appiicant shows 10'). Which is in violation of 90-125, secfion (1139.07) (ta6ie). W. Kremzar seconded thc motion, whacb was anaaimonsIy denied. Variance Denied Mr. Maloney advised tba# variance reqiaest #5 is for dispiay of inerchandise aiong Lorain Road which Planning Commission has recommended the board approve. The board felt that the display of the ears should be consisten# witla what was currently in place. N. Sergi moved to grant C& C Itealty of 27932 Lorain Road their reqaest for variance (1123.12), which consists of sife developxnent and that the foiiowing variance is granted: #5). A 68 faot variance for display of merchandise in front setback (Isorsin), (cade requires 75', applicaat shows 7'). Which is in violation of 90-125, section (1139.07) (table). W. Kremzar secondcd the ffiotion, which was unasimonsiy approved. Variaaee Granted Mr. Maloney asked for clarifacation on what would have to be imgated: Mr. It3?marczyk stated all land new and old zoned commercial must be irrigated axnd the residential section is not required to be irrigated under section 1139.14 as it is a comnaerciai regulation. Mr. O'MaRey suggested that although the green space was not commercial the board could treat it as commercial as the applicant's intenY is to use it as commerciat. Therefore, the 1oard coald require the applicant's to irrigate tIxe green space. J. Maloneyr moved to grant C& C Itealtg of 21932 Lorain Road their reqnest for variance (1123.12), whicb consists of site development and tbati the following variance is granted: #6)- A variance for irrigation on commerciat, (code reynires irrigation, apptipnt shows none). Which is in violation of 90-125, section (1139.14). T. Kelly seconded the motno8 roll call on the mation; J. Msloney, W. Kremzar "yes", N. Sergi, T. Kelly and M. Diver "no". Variance Denied - Mr. Maloney advised that vriance requests numbers #7 and #9 have been withdrawn by the applicants. Mrs. Sergi questioned if the lot could accommodate the required setback. IVir. Rymarczyk reviewed that distance requirements are based an tlae height of the lumanary, the degree of the cut-off on fhe 1ight fixture, the heighf of the poie arid the distance to the property line. The agplicants light poles are 20 feet Atop a 2%2 foot base which ffieans no matter what the degree of cut off is the pole must be a minimum of 180 feet from residential property lines. If tBae light pole were beiow 20 feet total in height with an 80 degree cut-aff it would only require the pole to be $S feet away from residentia.l Droperty lines. Tie vwiance only applies to the light pole along Dewey Road closest to the residentiallot lane. Mrs. Sergi questioned if 10 of15