06/02/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

there were any issues with light spillage. IV1r. Rymarczyk indicated that the current photometric plan showed the luminary levels within code. He suggested that if the applicant placed 2 or 3 smailer light poles with a different ctrt-off they may ineet city codes. However without seeing a photometric plan showing the smaller light poles and cut-offs he could not advise the boazd if such a plan vdould require variances or not. Mrs. Sergi felt that with the new plans showing zem readings at the lot line she felt that for securnty reasons the light pole variance was warranted. W. Kremzar ffioved to grant C&. C Itealty of 27932 Lorain Road their reqaest for variance (1123.12), which consists of site developffient and that the following variance is granted: #8}. A 98 foot variance for minimnm distance from re.sidential property of luminary based on mounting height, (eode requires 180', applicant shows $Z'). Which is in violatioa af 40-125, section (1161.12 (C)). J. Msloney seconded the motion, rnU csll on the motion; M. Diver "no", W. Kreffizar, N. Sergi, T. Kelly, and J. Maloney "yes". Variance Granted. Clerks Note: this reqnest was granted reconsideration on 7I7l05 meeting 9. B.A.D. Bovs Ltd; 28597 I.orain Road: (WRD 3) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposa.l consists of a new development. 1he following yariances are reqZested: 1. A 60 foot variance for minimum distance from residential property Iine to Iuminaries, (code . requires 180 $, applicant shows 220 ft), sectian (1161.12 (E)) 2. A.1 foot candle variance for minimum foot candle in a pazking lot, (code requires .1 minimurn, applicant shovs .0), section (1161.22 (G) Tabie). 3. A 2 foot 6 inch variance for a wall sign higher than code permits, (code permits 4'-0", applicant shows 6-6"), section (1163.27 (C)). 4. An 82 square foot variance for a wa11 s'ign larger than code permits, (code permits 100 sq ft, applacant shows 182 s4 ft)= section (1163.27 (C}). 5. A 6 sc}uare foot variance for total signage on a Tot, (code permits 296 sq ft, applicant shows 302 sq ft), sectiom (1163.24 (A)). 6. A 53.25 squaze foot variance for fotmi square footage of wa11 signs on a building, (code pexniits 128.95 sq ft, applicant shows 182 sq ft), section (1163.24 (B}). Which is in violation of 90-125, Sections (116I .12 (E))a (1161.I2 (C) TabTe), (1163.27 (C)), (1163.24 (A)) and (1163.24 (B)). Note: 1). Item #1 applies to the 2 rear light poles. Mr. 1Vlatoney called alI interested pazties forvvard, however as no aae came forwarci the chairman advised that t1ie case would be addressect at the end of tIie docket. After all cases were completed again the chainnan called for all interested garties to come forwazd aad again no one came forward. Mr. Malaney advised the clerk to rernind the applicants that it is mandairory to lave a representative present at the meeting. Therefore, B.A.D. Boys Ltd of 28597 Lorain Road is tabled untiI meeting next. 10. N O. Town Center fPMcel E) 24642-25174 Brookaark Road: fM 4) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a sign package. The following varaances are requested: l. A variance for 6 ground signs on a lot, (code perrnits 2, applicant shows 6), section (1163.26 (A)). (See note) 2. A 155 foot variance for ground sign too close together sign B west & sign A, (code requires 200', applicant shows 45'), section (1163.26 (A)). 3. A 155 foot variance for ground sign to close together sign B east & sign A, (code requires 200', applicant shows 45'), section (1163.26 (A)). 11 of 15