09/01/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1. A 19.5 foot variance for an accessory structure located within a required neighbors front setback on a corner lot, (code requires 50', applicant shows 30.5'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (DS)). Mr. & Mrs. Piwarski, and Mr. Bay, a neighbor each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. I'iwarski showed pictures to the boaxd to show where the garage would be placed. The existing dilapidating garage needs to be replaced. '1 he garage would be a new 24' x 24' garage with concrete driveway. Mr. Maloney read aloud a letter from the applicants neighbors stating they had no objections to the request. Mr. Bay indicated that he had no objections to the request. N. Sergi moved to grant Douglas & Susan Piwarski of 23990 1Vlastick their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of replacing tlae ezisting garage and that the fvllowing variance is granted: 1. A 19.5 foot variance for an accessory structure located within a required neighbors front setback on a corner lot, (code requires 50', applicant shows 30.5'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (D5)). M. Diver seconded the motion, which was unanamously approved. 2. James Folev; 3270 Clague Road: W1 Request for vaxiance (1123.12). T'he proposal consists of a new fence on a corner lot. The following variances are requested: 1. A 12 foot variance for a 6 feet fence located in neighbors front setback on a corner lot, (code requires 50', applicant shows 38'), section (1135.02 (F2)). 2. A 42 inch variance for height of fence in neighbors front setback on a corner lot, (code requires 30", applicant shows 72"), section (1135.02 (F1)). 3. A variance for a fence less than 50% open in neighbors setback ori a corner lot, (code requires 50% open, applicant shows solid), section (1135.02 Fl)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (F2)) and (1135.02 (F1)). Mr. & Mrs. Foley, the owners, and Mr. Korey a neighbor each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. Foley indicted that there is a chain link fence in place now which would be replaced with a white vinyl fence which will have lattice atop the fence close to the house to create a patio azea. The fence would only go to back of the shrubs. They have no privacy in the yard as it faces the street and the size of the vinyl fence only comes to a 6-feet height. Mrs. Diver reviewed that the code requires fencing much smaller and more open. Mr. Foley suggested that the vinyl fencing only comes in a 6-foot height and there is not a 5-foot height, but the. lattice which is open is 1-foot high. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that there was only a sma11 section of the fence that requires a variance. Mr. Maloney reviewed that the top of the fenee would be 1-foot of lattice. W. Kremzar moved to grant Jaanes Foley of 3270 Clague Road bis request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a new fence on a corner lot and that the following variances are granted as amended: 1. A 12 foot variance for a 6 foot fence located in neigh6ors front setback on a corner lot, (code requires 50', applicant shows 38'), section (1135.02 (F2)). 2. A 42 inch variance for height of fence an neighbors front setback on a corner lot, (code requires 3011, applicant shows 72"), section (1135.02 (Fl)). . 3. A variance for a fence less than 50% open in neighbors setback on a corner lot, (code requires 50% open, applicant shows solid), secdion (1135.02 Fl)). Conditioned that the 1- foot laLtice will be atop the fence as presented to board and shown on plans. 5 of10