|
BOARD OF ZOIVING APPEALS 2005 REPORT
<br />Which is in violation of 90-125, Sections (1135.06 (A)), (11235.03 (B)), (1135.05 (A1)), and
<br />(1135.05 (A3)). W. Kremzar seconded the motion, roll call on the motion; J. Maloney, W.
<br />Kremzar, T. Kelly "yes" and N. Sergi, M. Diver "no". Variances Granted. 6/2/05
<br />Mr. Dajguppa; 5712 Burns Road: (WRD 3)
<br />W. Kremzar moved to grant Mr. Dasgupta of 5712 Burns Road his request for variance
<br />(1123.12), which consists of adding an enclosure on rear deck and that the following variances
<br />are granted: *A special permit to add to a non-conforming building (1165.02), the existing
<br />residence is 38 feet from rear property line, and code requires 50 foot. 1. A 24 foot variance for
<br />a dwelling to close to rear property line, (code requires 50', applicant shows 26'), section
<br />(1135.08 (A)). Which is in violation of 90-125, Sections (1165.02) and (1135.08 (A)). J.
<br />Maloney seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. 6/2/05
<br />C& C Realtv; 27932 Lorain Road: (WRD 1)
<br />J. Maloney moved to table C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for #1) a use
<br />variance for allowing parking & storage of vehicles for a car dealership on residentially zoned
<br />land. M. Diver seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. Use Permit Tabled
<br />6/2/OS
<br />Board members felt that for the continuity of the site the setback along Lorain should be
<br />consistent.
<br />W. Kremzar moved to grant C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for variance
<br />(1123.12), which consists of site development and that the following variance is granted: #2). A
<br />13 foot variance for parking setback along Lorain Road, (code requires 20', applicant shows 7').
<br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1139.07) (table). J. Maloney seconded the motion,
<br />which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted 6/2/05
<br />W. Kremzar moved to grant C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for variance
<br />(1123.12), which consists of site development and that the following variance is granted: #3). A 5
<br />foot variance for parking setback along Dewey Road, (code requires 20', applicant shows 15').
<br />Which is in violation of 90-125, section (1139.07) (table). N. Sergi seconded the motion, which
<br />was unanimously denied. Variance Denied 6/2/05
<br />J. Maloney moved to grant C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for variance
<br />(1123.12), which consists of site development and that the following variance is granted: #4). A
<br />10 foot variance for parking setback along north 125 foot commercial property line, (code
<br />requires 20', applicant shows 10'). Which is in violation of 90-125, section (1139.07) (table). W.
<br />Kremzar seconded the motion, which was unanimously denied. Variance Denied 6/2/05
<br />N. Sergi moved to grant C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for variance (1123.12),
<br />which consists of site development and that the following variance is granted: #5). A 68 foot
<br />variance for display of inerchandise in front setback (Lorain), (code requires 75', applicant shows
<br />7'). Which is in violation of 90-125, section (1139.07) (table). W. Kremzar seconded the
<br />motion, which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted 6/2/05
<br />J. Maloney moved to grant C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for variance
<br />(1123.12), which consists of site development and that the following variance is granted: 46). A
<br />variance for irrigation on commercial, (code requires irrigation, applicant shows none). Which is
<br />in violation of 90-125, section (1139.14). T. Kelly seconded the motion roll call on the motion;
<br />J. Maloney, W. Kremzar "yes", N. Sergi, T. Kelly and M. Diver "no". Variance Denied 6/2/05
<br />W. Kremzar moved to grant C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for variance
<br />(1123.12), which consists of site development and that the following variance is granted: #8). A
<br />98 foot variance for minimum distance from residential property of luminary based on mounting
<br />height, (code requires 180', applicant shows 82'). Which is in violation of 90-125, section
<br />(1161.12 (C)). J. Maloney seconded the motion, roll call on the motion; M. Diver "no", W.
<br />Kremzar, N. Sergi, T. Kelly, and J. Maloney "yes". Variance Granted. 6/2/05
<br />9
|