My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/12/2005 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2005
>
2005 Landmarks Commission
>
12/12/2005 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:46:15 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 3:39:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2005
Board Name
Landmarks Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. , . <br />" built in 1830 and the walls are at least 2-feet thick. She believed that her family purchased the <br />home around 1936. The ceiling in the basement still has bark on the wood used. Her parents <br />added the rear back porch after they purchased the home. Her husband put on two additions one <br />over the rear concrete steps that were outside the home and led to the basement. The second <br />addition was to widen the back porch. Ms. Eian told the commission that her childhood horse <br />was berried close to the metroparks property. Her name was Molly Pitcher and she hopes that <br />her body is not disturbed during the construction. There is a cistern under the north east kitchen <br />area. Mrs. Lord suggested that there were possibly up to 8 additions added to the original <br />structure but they would not know for sure until Mr. Schumann is allowed to inspect the home. <br />Ms. Eian believed that the Stearns home was sold due to the family's foreclosure of the home <br />which was caused by the tax's due for paving Lorain Road. Her parents purchased the home <br />then put the home in her and her brother's names and then when her brother went into the <br />service they put everything in her name. Mrs. Lord indicated that the County records show <br />there was a foreclosure in 1935 on the home and that there were 4 transactions on the home in <br />1937. <br />Mrs. Lord suggested that Frostville seemed to be interested in the carriage house and asked if <br />Ms. Eian had any information on it. Ms. Eian advised that their hired hand built a bar above the <br />carriage house and there was a chicken coop next to it that was removed. Mr. Schock <br />questioned if the carriage house was a barn for horses before it was converted into the two car <br />garage. Ms. Eian advised that the two car garage was there when her family purchased the <br />home and the barn was behind the home. Mrs. Lord advised that her notes show that maps <br />show in 1860 there was a house and barn, in 1870 there was a house near the eastern edge of the <br />property and a barn near the western edge of the property. A house and barn was shown on a <br />map of 1880, and the barn at that point was behind the home. The records also showed that <br />there was 19 acres in 1860, 1870, and 1880 she questioned how many acres the lot was now. <br />Ms. Eian stated that there was only 4 acres now. <br />Mrs. Lord advised that the commission was working to try to save the original home. However <br />there was a very short timeframe in which to do so as the land would be cleared before April. <br />Mr. Barlcer indicated that the City is talking with the Metroparks with regards to having a joint <br />driveway on the site and moving the building further west on the site. He believes that the <br />consensus of the Mayor is that there were so many additions to the original home that it would <br />not be worth saving however, it may be worth saving the carriage house. Mr. Schock hoped <br />that the wrong photos of the home didn't play a part in the Mayor's decision to not save the <br />home. Mr. Barker believed that there were many factors involved in the decision. Mr. Lang <br />aslced if the sisters had discussed possibly making a financial contribution to save the home. <br />Ms. Eian advised that her sister-in-law could not wait to move out and leave to live with her <br />son. The commission advised that they would like to save the home as well and they would <br />continue to do what they could to make it happen but they are not in a good position. <br />After a brief discussion the commission concluded that to move the home to Ms. Eian's <br />property along Elmhurst would place the home in an impossible position to move later. <br />Commissioners discussed possible costs of moving the home including electrical lines being <br />moved, security help, movers, and other ancillary costs. The Commissioners felt that if the <br />home was to be saved it would have to be through the family possibly donating funds or setting <br />up a trust to save the home. Ms. Eian advised that she was the last of her family and although <br />she believed is saving History and would love to see the family home moved to the valley she <br />does not think she wants to pay to have the home moved. Mrs. Lord advised that unless some <br />type of fund was set up to save the home the commission was not in a position to move the <br />home. The commission thanked Ms. Eian for attending their meeting and discussing her family <br />home. 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.