Laserfiche WebLink
? place and time is of the essence so the church could be restored. Ivprs. Lord voiced that there <br />was not much documenta.tion and the commission is not sure what might have been talcen out <br />of the churches records before they were given to the comynission. Mr. Barker felt the <br />documents should be given to the Olmsted Historical Society and suggested that as the <br />Landmarlcs Commission and City as a whole seemed to have storage space problems with <br />documents donated by residents the commission may want to take a look at turning <br />additional documents over to the society to maintain. Mr. Schumann voiced that there was <br />quite a bit of historical documents in the basement of Old Town Ha11. However, the city <br />would have to be aware that once any items or form of documentation is turned over to the <br />Historical5ociety it becomes titled to the Historical Society and they are free to do what ever <br />they see fit with things once it is turned over to them. The City could never go back aaid <br />request the items back the donation is a one-way door. Ms. Cadwallader assured the <br />comynission tliat if there was in fact historical artifacts in what is turned over the society <br />would keep them. However, the Society does reserve the right to handle or deal with any <br />items donated as they feel is appropriate. N1rs. Lord suggested that tlie commission would <br />also have to look into the new state regulations perta.ining to official City records, which is <br />the bulk of their items. 1VIs. Cadwallader ind'acated that as they are also limited with storage <br />space they would really only be interested in documents or items pertaining to the Barton <br />Road Church at this titne. . <br />Mr. Lang indicated that he was working with the clerk of Council as well as the designee of <br />the records committee regazding Landmarks aachives. Before any items could be <br />deaccessioned and turned oeer, the commission would have to inventory anytlung and <br />everything the commission would want to pass on to the historical society and then submit it <br />to #he Ohio Historical Society for permission to deaccession before fmal release. Although <br />the society once in possession of items can do as they please, La.udmarks as a government <br />entity can not just do as they please. <br />Vd. COM1VIITTEE REPORTS: <br />Mr. Schumann indieated #hat he would have one 3ites Student in the fall and would be using <br />him on weekends at the liistorical society to earn his hours and have hian attend Landmarks <br />monthly meetings. Mr. Lang thanked Mr. Schumann for his work with the Sites Students. <br />Mr. Schumann reviewed that all the sandstone used on the church was salvaged for reuse at <br />the museutn. The church had rumble stone in the basement, which rneans it was added to the <br />church in the 1860's or 1870's. Rumble stone style is whereby the stones are pieced together <br />without the use of mortar each piece is individually selected to be fitted together. The <br />basement would have been dug out and the church supported by footers a.nd then the rumble <br />stone style basement would have been pieced together. Three or four times during the <br />demolition phase of separating the church a metal detector group came through the site amd <br />found a 1905 or 1910 dime, a congregational Sunday school pin from the 1900's and a few <br />other nick-lnacks. During tlae move the original collection plates were fouaid and they are <br />being refinished. They plan on displaying the plates and maybe even passing it around. <br />VII. OLD BIJSINESS: <br />Mrs. Lord questioned what the commission would need to do to rectify a mistake that was <br />made when joining the Olmsted I3istorical Society. Landmarks purchased an individual <br />membership not an orgaauzation merrnbership which was their intent. Ms. Cadwallader <br />3