My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/10/2005 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2005
>
2005 Planning Commission
>
03/10/2005 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:46:20 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 3:52:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2005
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Paul Barlcer stated that Ms. Wenger, the Committee and all involved did a very nice job. While <br />attending the budget hearings the past few weelcs, he said funding is a big issue. He noticed in <br />the infrastructure and community facilities chapters that there are recommendations to pursue <br />funding alternatives for infrastructure financing. He asked if there are any ideas rather than <br />going to the bank or raising taxes. He said our community is facing financial problems and <br />asked Ms. Wenger what ideas she has. Ms. Wenger said it may not be funding sources but <br />methods of financing. It could be that when a new development is proposed that the developer <br />will put some money into a pot for infrastructure improvements. Ms. Wenger described tax <br />increment financing where the City could capture an increment of the property value increase to <br />fiind infrastructure improvements. There may also be new ways of doing business. Ms. Wenger <br />gave the example of Service Director Driscoll's approach to look forward to a five year plan, <br />including looking at possible different approaches and new ways to accomplish providing <br />services to residents which are more cost effective. Mr. Barker also concurred with Ms. Wenger <br />that Mr. Driscoll's five year plan is promising and has hopes it is implemented. He indicated <br />that whoever talces over next year will continue with the five year plan. <br />Stan Ball who resides in Park Ridge came forward. He said that when I-480 was first proposed, <br />it was turned down. Several years later when voting occurred again, Park Ridge had a problem <br />with it. He is concerned that it will affect property values. There are 317 homes buffered on <br />both sides by Stearns Road and McKenzie Roads. One of the things promised for the Sterns <br />Road extension was that there would be no apartment or office type buildings planned for those <br />roads. These were the two streets that have the deepest lots of 500 ft. This is in violation of <br />building code section 405.3.1. Although he realizes buffers are planned, he said they are not <br />what they should be and indicated three foot trees and such do not create a buffer zone. They <br />hardly impede any noise from coming in. He iridicated that it is going to take some selling for <br />them because previously they were promised nothing would go in this area. Now, it is going to <br />be mixed-use apartment buildings. Ms. Wenger . said it will be a significant process to process to <br />determine what is appropriate for Sterns Road. While, office mixed use and office and <br />residential was the recommended land use, there will need to be a zoning undertaking and at that <br />time, all residents' various concerns will be taken into consideration. Ms Wenger said the City <br />will worlc together with the residents to make su'e that what is determined is best for abutting the <br />residents. At this point, it is too early, to say what this will be. The zoning has not been <br />determined yet. The resident informed Ms. Wenger that he, will inform this development <br />committee together when this will be up for discussion. Mr. Koeth then said continuous <br />coinmunication in order to get input and feedbaclc'for everyone. Mr. Ball asked what changes <br />are meant for McKenzie Road. He said there are nursery, homes and such back there. Ms. <br />Wenger then said no changes are proposed for McKenzie Road. <br />Kay Given is concerned about the west end where zoning is being changed from industry to <br />residential. She wants to know why the City is alliowing a 52 cluster home office buildings. She <br />aslced why this area can't be left alone and develop it as it already is. Ms Wenger informed Mrs. <br />Given that the rezoning that she is talking about is separate and apart from this Master Plan. In <br />1992, the west end was one of the focus areas that were discussed in detail. At that time, it was <br />i. . i•.? i,, ?` ? ? ? <br />recommended that there is a certain portion of land known as the? triangle,? BradT•ey/North <br />RidgevilleBarton that was currently zoned, a portion of which was industrial, but didn't have <br />industry and was not right for industry, and in fact, had residences, city facilities and open space.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.