Laserfiche WebLink
stormwater detention system used, the amount of greenspace, and if a filter system is required on <br />the storm-sewer inlets it would require a perpetual maintenance program. <br />Mr. Rymarczyk indicated there was a conflict in two of the drawings pages E101 and ElA as <br />E101 shows an additional light on the exterior rear of the building and it is not shown on ElA. If <br />in fact the light is to remain it should also be shown on the photometric plan. The front pole <br />lights shown require a variance, however if a flat lens and full cutoff is used applicants would not <br />require a variance. The roof top units shown are not screened and the applicant stated roof top <br />units would not be visible from the right of way. <br />Applicant's presentation: <br />Mr. Morgan the Real Estate Manager for Gordon Food Service was present to address the <br />proposal. Mr. Mor?an reviewed that Gordon Food Service had been in business for over 100 <br />years and was the 4t largest food distributor in the United States and second largest in Canada. <br />They mainly service Churches, Schools, Hospitals, Catering Halls and Banquet facilities with <br />more than 30,000 accounts. 27 years ago the company started opening retail stores and currently <br />has 115 retail stores across the United States. They do not have membership fees and are about <br />the size of an Aldi's store and sell bulk foods like Sam's and Costco clubs. They are a low <br />impact store and only 2 semi truck deliveries a week are made between 10:00 am & 12:00 and <br />the trucks are parlced in the loading doclc for only 10 to 15 minutes. There are route trucks <br />Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays which is a smaller truck about 25 feet long. There are daily <br />deliveries such as bread, pop, ice cream trucks and are delivered through the front door. <br />The placement of the new building was chosen to have the least amount of impact on the <br />apartment complex as possible. They do not have a heavy traffic flow and as requested one of <br />the curb-cuts was removed. During weekly peak hours in the p.m. there is on average 13 to 17 <br />cars and on weekends there are 25 to 30 cars on average. Landscaping added is a row of 47 <br />arborvitaes along the apartment border line planted 5 feet tall and grow to a 7 foot height within <br />2 years. There will be junipers planted around the ground sign and the site will include 3 maple <br />trees. Sod will be used from the back of the building forward to Lorain Road and the rest of the <br />grass area is to be hydro seeded and include an irrigation system throughout the lot. It is their <br />intent to try to save the existing trees on the site however he noted that currently there were tree <br />roots which are protruding through the asphalt drive along the rear which may become an issue <br />during construction. The new development will have 20% less asphalt then what is currently <br />there. There will be a segmental block, 2-foot high retaining wall which will run 210 feet along <br />the east property line to buffer the apartment complex. There will be three courses above grade <br />and one course below ground. Their intent is to level off some of the current grading as there <br />will be shopping carts used. The sign package follows city codes as there will be a 25 square <br />foot per side 6-foot high ground sign and one wall sign 4-foot high by 24-feet long. The <br />November 4th engineer plan submitted clarifies that there would be 4 CC type lights on the <br />building. The front pole lights would in fact have flat lights with full cutoffs per code. The <br />HVAC units which will be atop the roof will not be visible from the right of way nor the second <br />floor of the apartment complex. <br />Mr. Spalding reviewed that he visited the Strongsville store which was a brick building with the <br />red awning and the retaining wall was around most of the area. Mr. Morgan reviewed that the <br />barrier wall and building was constructed to match the neighboring sites in Strongsville. There is <br />also a cost factor at the current location not normally encountered at other sites such as a Geo <br />study which showed the site is over bad fill which requires replacing 12-feet of fill dirt, <br />demolition of existing building and replacing a failing underground retention system. The <br />2