My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/23/2007 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2007
>
2007 Planning and Design Commission
>
05/23/2007 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:46:42 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 4:53:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2007
Board Name
Planning & Design Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/23/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
place a condition requiring PetSmart to periodically perform odor and noise testing at the North <br />Olmsted site once it is constructed. <br />Mr. O'Malley reviewed the differences between the two conditional uses being requested and <br />agreed with the Building Commissioners request for periodic noise and odor tests. <br />Mr. Lee, the applicant's attorney, and Mr. Whiteaker, PetSmart Zoning Manager, addressed the <br />request. Mr. Lee reviewed his client's lengthy process of working with the city to get to their <br />meeting with the commission. Mr. Lasko questioned if the landlord had an opportunity to <br />review and approve PetSmart's proposal to add the PetHotel. Mr. Whiteaker answered yes and <br />suggested if the conditional use permit was granted the landlord would allow them to extend <br />their lease an additiona125 years. Mr. Lee reviewed that the indoor PetHotel was a new concept <br />and would provide 24 hour care for dogs and cats, with normal business hours that are currently <br />practiced. The facility will have only one entrance which is used for the existing PetSmart store. <br />There will be two separate air circulation systems within the hotel which will not create a burden <br />on the government facilities or existing store. All noise and odors will be contained within the <br />building. The rear wall of the existing PetSmart store is 367 feet from the nearest residentially <br />zoned property line as shown on their site plan. The exterior walls of the hotel will match the <br />store's existing walls in both colors and materials. The only change in governmental services <br />will be from the fecal matter being added to the sewer system which the North Olmsted Service <br />Director has determined would not create an added burden. Traffic patterns to and from the store <br />will not be effected as there is ample parking and pets are allowed on site now. The requirement <br />of providing periodic studies once the hotel is opened would be quite costly, so they asked that <br />an economically feasible method for testing with the city be arranged. <br />The applicant reviewed conditional use permit criteria and standards in Chapter 1118.03(a) <br />through ( fl and described that the proposal met all of the general conditions and is compatible <br />with the existing shopping center. <br />Mr. Whiteaker reviewed the layout of the PetHotel which includes a check-in area, walking <br />paths, play areas, laundry room, grooming area, bone booth, 53 large dog rooms, 72 regular dog <br />rooms, 10 dog suites and 12 cat rooms. The hotel is cleaned a minimum of twice a day or more <br />depending on the traffic volume. Total occupancy in compliance to the Humane Society <br />standards is 160 animals on site. Dog and cat areas are kept separate so they do not come into <br />contact with each other at any time. The rooms in the atrium are stainless surrounds with wire <br />gates. The remaining rooms are metal stud framed walls with ceramic tile. Mr. Malone <br />questioned how the back door would be utilized. Mr. Whiteaker advised that the door was an <br />existing door which would not be used but kept for emergency exit only. There will be <br />employees/caregivers on site 24 hours a day. Third shift employee totals will depend on the <br />number of pets in the hotel. Mr. Malone questioned the need for the vet sign when there is not a <br />permanent vet on site. <br />Mr. Rerko believed that the report was not as important as the building materials. There should <br />be soundproof glass in lieu of single pane glass. If masonry is used instead of drywall it will <br />vibrate the sounds not buffer them. Perforated decks are shown in the space which should <br />include buffering materials atop the deck. He questioned if the buffering methods took into <br />account different size dogs' barks which have different frequencies. He felt the city should set <br />decibel levels for the applicants not to exceed and then leave it up to them to use building <br />materials to ensure the decibel readings are not exceeded. If the facility is constructed of nothing <br />but concrete then the sounds will be amplified by the concrete. Mr. Whiteaker said the Duke <br />study submitted was conducted at their prototypical store which has solid masonry block wall <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.