Laserfiche WebLink
i'l <br />lights are ninety degrees to the ground. Mr. Tallon questioned the elevation of the front of <br />the roof on the side. Mr. Foerster was unsure of that height and questioned what Mr. Tallon <br />was attempting to determine. Mr. Tallon stated the poles should be cut down to 20 feet to <br />keep them all below the face of the building. He noted, on the rear of the build.ing, this is <br />especially important so as to prevent any glare into the windows of the rear properties. Mr. <br />Foerster stated those lights are aimed towards the restaurant and there would not be any glare. <br />Mr. Tallon questioned how the lights are being ai.med towards the building if they are <br />mounted 90 degrees to the ground. Mr. Foerster clarified the illumination will be directed <br />toward the restaurant but the fixture will be mounted 90 degrees to the ground. The height of <br />the poles in question was 22 feet, or a 20 foot pole on top of a 2 foot base, which would make <br />it 24 feet to the top of the fixhue. Mr. Foerster noted there is approximately a five (5') foot <br />change of grade from the front to the back of the building. Mr. Tallon recommended making <br />the new pole 20 foot from the bottom of the base to the top of the fixture. Mr. Foerster <br />agreed to the recommendation to keep it 20 feet overall. Mr. Brennan stated the only <br />problem witli the roof lights is they may be neglected over time as far as maintenance, <br />changing the lamps, etc. Mr. Tallon noted there are nine (9) roof lights. Mr. Foerster <br />confirmed there will be a total of nine roof lights which will include: 2 on the rear of the <br />building, 3 along the front roof line (facia board); 2 on the new dormer; 1 on the east side; and <br />1 on the west side, Mr. Tallon advised this type of lighting is not in the best interest of the <br />citizens of North Olmsted or the City of North Olmsted because: it is not aestherically <br />appealing; causes nuisance lighting; maintenance becomes an issue; and it becomes a sign by <br />drawing attention to the buildiug. Mr. "Stipanek, General Manager of the North Olmsted <br />store, argued the roof lights will enhance the architectural elements. He stated currently the <br />building is pitch black during the evening hours which is very unattractive. As the General <br />Manager, Mr. Stipanek stated he would be responsible for the maintenance of the roof lights. <br />Mr. Tallon agreed beautiful architecture should be lit up, but this is simply a tin roof which is <br />not gothic architecture. If removing the roof lighting is a consensus of the commission, Mr. <br />Foerster asked that it be restricted from the request. Mr. Brennan noted, for parking lot <br />lighting, The Illuminated Engineering Society recommends .9 foot candles for a pedestrian <br />vehicle area with high activity, and currently Baker's Square has 2.1 foot candles. This <br />proposal will increase the lighting to 3.5 foot candles, and Mr. Brennan questioned the <br />purpose ofthis increase as tliis property does abut a residential area. Mr. Foerster pointed out <br />there is a great distance between this properiy and the residential properties. The purpose of <br />the request is primarily for safety reasons, as there have been nu.merous incidents at other <br />locations. He was working towards a two foot candle level as it satisfies the insurance <br />companies and reduces the risk for the patrons. Mr. Brennan pointed out there are currently <br />two (2') foot candles without the additional poles. Mr. Tallon clarified the comuussion did <br />not have a problem with the increase of lighting towards the building itself but towards the <br />outer extremities near the residents there is some concem as there are light spill overs and <br />nuisance lighting. He further noted this commission wants this business to succeed in this <br />area, be safe for the patrons, and still respect the residents of this community by maintaining <br />the best possible buffering for the residential area while working towards a goaL Mr. <br />Spalding questioned if the hedging will be continued along the southwest corner of the <br />property so that there is an additional buffer for the residents. Mr. Foerster stated that was a <br />compromise to putting the neon on the building. Since there will be no neon, the buffer may <br />not be needed. Mr. Spalding requested that the buffer be continued around the south west