My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/17/1998 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1998
>
1998 Architectural Review Board
>
06/17/1998 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:50 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 3:22:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1998
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br />if it was possible to incorporate the brick onto the bottom portion of the building, as the EIFS <br />maxerial will eventually wear over time. Mr. Fisher agreed to incorporate this suggestion into <br />his next submission. Per plauuiug couunissions request: the site lights were shown as 16 feet <br />high (no taller than the building); there were anti-glare fixtures so that the bulb is not visible <br />at any augle unless one is directly under the liglit; there are 0 foot candles at the property line; <br />the accent liglnts located on each side of the tower as well as each side of the pick-up window <br />will include a 60 watt bulb; and there are accent fixtures over the canopy wluch include 70 <br />watt bulbs. The members reviewed the elevations. Mr. Yager noted tlus is one of the best <br />presentations he has seen since becoming a member of the architectural review board. He <br />offered the following suggestions: removing one sign on each elevation to reduce the total <br />amount of building signage to a total of two signs; incorporating a brick face on the those <br />columns at the entry point; and darkening the brick color slightly because the burgundy <br />canopies are too dominant. Mr. Zergott concurred with Mr. Yager's suggestions, and <br />questioned if the arclutect has hired a landscape designer. Mr. Fisher advised, as an architect, <br />he provided the landscaping details. Mr. Zergott explained landscaping in North Olmsted is <br />extremely important and noted plants such as `Box Wood" will not survive on a southem <br />exposure and the "Dog Wood" is one of the most fragile trees made. Mr. Tyson stated there <br />are `Box Woods" and "Dog Woods" at the Lakewood site which seam to be surviviug just <br />fine. Mr. Zergott explained the likelihood of those types of plant materials to survive really <br />depends upon the exposure. He elaborated a North or East exposure offers protection from <br />the hot afternoon sun. Mr. Fisher agreed to utilize an altemative ornamental tree, but <br />maintained he would like to use a tree that is going to blossom. Mr. Zergott agreed, but <br />suggested that the architect speak with any landscape designer for some input on the types of <br />trees to utilize. He added landscaping should also be incorporated out around the green <br />space rather than just trees and especially around the bottom of the monuvient sign. Mr. <br />Yager added this type of landscaping is beneficial to the restaurant as it will actually enhance <br />or draw attention to the sign. Mr. Zergott noted the same type of plant material utilized at <br />the bottom of the sign could also be incoiporated at each of the entrances thereby creating a <br />relationship. Mr. Zergott noted a revised landscape plan should be submitted before the next <br />board meeting. Mr. Tyson stated he would like to keep the signage on the tower to maintain <br />the corporate image of a Donato's Pizza. He noted without the signage the tower looses its <br />impact. Mr. Zergott suggested keeping the tower sign and removing the other sign on each <br />elevation. Mr. Tyson agreed to take the suggestion to remove the logo back to the franchisor <br />for consideration. The members discussed altematives to using the logo on the tower. Mr. <br />Fisher noted they could do an awning in the tower area to create a repetition of the red. Mr. <br />Yager stated he would leave this up to the architect to resolve as they have done a terrific job <br />to this point. The clerk noted that planuing commission referrecl the proposal to the city <br />forester, city traffic engineer, and the safety forces. Mr. Rymarczyk added variances will be <br />needed from the board of zoning appeals for the signage as well as the drives. He requested <br />that the clerk include in the minutes that the drives are required to be 90 degrees from the <br />right of way and a 25 foot radius. Mr. Rymarczyk explained seven copies of plans are <br />needed as soon as possible for the board of zoning appeals which should depict dimensions of <br />all signs and the location of the monument sign. Mr. Tyson stated he would like to keep the <br />reader board to annouuce community events as well as specials. The members suggested that <br />Mr. Tyson argue his point in front of the board of zoning appeals. Mr. Yager elaborated the <br />architectural review board will make a recommendation to the board of zoning appeals, <br />however board of zoning appeals is the board responsible for final approval of tlie signage.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.