09/10/1998 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? . written out on the inspectors sheet. You have 110' x 15 `ft rear yard, 20% of that is 1100' Sq ft You have a garage and porch that is 644' Sq ft You have a deck that is 10' x 16' ft, and a shed that is 10'x10' ft Mr. Conway indicated he could.n't see the shed on the site plans. Mr. Homolak indicated there is no shed. The inspector indicated if the 10' x 10' ft shed was removed, it would give me 100' ft more, so the shed was removed. Mr. Conway indicated then you only need a 156' Sq ft Variance. Mr. Gomersall indicated we will use the 156' Sq ft for the variance that is needed. Mr. Gomersall asked if there were any further questions from the board members or audience members. Mr. Moloney suggested he was at the site earlier in the day, and in his opinion the swimming pool will not interfere with any neighbors. No further comments were made. T. Koberna moved to grant Michael Homolak; 5647 Whitehaven his request for variance (1123.12). A 156 square foot variance to install a swimming pool in the rear yard that exceeds 20% of the required area of the rear yard. Which is a Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (d-2). The motion was seconded by J. Konold, and unaniinously approved. Variance Granted. 8. Howard Dillinger; 28265 Nandina Drive: Request for variance (1123.12). Request a variance to install shed of 96. Sq ft Which exceeds 2% of rear yard by 7. Sq ft. All so requests variance to place shed siac feet from the rear property line and two and one-half feet from the side property line. 1). Request a 7. Sq ft Variance for excess size. 2). Request a 4. ft Variance for encroacbment of required rear set back. 3). 2-1/2 ft Variance for encroachment ofrequired side set back. Violation ofOrd. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (d-1) (size), 1135.02 (d-4) (setback encroachments). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Dillinger. Mr. Gomersall read allowed the variances being requested. Mr. Gomersall asked if any of the board members had any questions for Mr. Dillinger or if any audience members had any concerns regarding this case. No further comments were made. J. Konold moved to grant Howard Dillinger; 28265 Nandina Drive, his request for variance (1123.12). A variance to install a shed of 96' Sq ft which exceeds 2% of rear yard. 1). A 7' Sq ft variance for excess size. 2). A 4' ft variance for encroachment of required rear set back. 3). A 2-112 ft variance for encroachment of required side set back Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (d-1) (size), 1135.02 (d-4) (setback encroachments). The motion was seconded by J. Kremzar, and unanimously approved. Variance Granted. 9. Health & Fitness; 4609 Crreat Northern: Request for variance (1123.12). Request a 12. Sq ft variance for sign face area. Proposal for 52. Sq ft Of wall signage where as the code permits a maximum of 40' Sq ft a violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1163.11 (b) Note: this was originally approved by the Board of zoning appeals in December of 1996, and never installed. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Mr. Prokopovich. Mr. Gomersall suggested we approved this for you a couple of years ago did we not. Mr. Prokopovich indicated we didn't act on it before ou.r time expired. Mr. Moloney asked if there was a sign on the bu.ilding now. Mr. Prokopovich replied yes, but it is smaller then everyone around us which makes us hard to see. That is why we would like to increase the sign size. Mr. Gomersall 5 ?