06/04/1998 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r? 5. Tim and Donna SzcMinski, 23958 Elm Road Reguest for variance (1123.12). Request a 2 foot 6 inch side setback variance to construct new garage. Violation of O'rd. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (C-2). Chainnan Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was administered to Tim Szczepsinski. Mr. Gomersall reviewed the variance and asked if the old garage would be removed. Mr. Szczepsinski stated the old garage has aiready been removed. Mr. Gomersall asked why Mr. Szczepsinski just doesn't move the proposed garage over to bring it up to code. Mr. Szczepsinski stated the addition would not allow enough space to move freely in and out of the garage if it is not moved. Mr. Maloney asked what would be done to address the drainage. Mr. Szczepsinski stated down spouts will be put on the garage and will tie into the old drain if it is still fiwctional. Mr. Kremzar asked if the down spouts or gutters would protrude over the fence. Mr. Szczepsinski stated no we will still be 2'.6" in from my fence. ? J. Maloney moved to grant Tim and Donna Szczepinski, 23958 Elm Road variance (1123.12). A 2 foot 6 inch side setback variance to construct a new garage. Provided gutters and down spout drainage is provided for this facility. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02 (C-2). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Variance Granted. 6. Arthur Schmotzer, 5776 Park Rid e?Road. , Request for variance (1123.12). Request variance to have a non-permauent chain link enclosure on the side of the house, said enclosure would intrude nineteen (19) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot setback. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.06 (B). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the board. The oath was acimiuistered to Jeanne Schmotzer. Mr. Gomersall asked if Mr. & Mrs. Schmotzer erected the chain link enclosure themselves. Mrs. Schmotzer stated yes the fixture is a non permauent structure there for we didn't think we would need a permit. Mr. Gomersall asked Mr. Ryinarczyk how did this case come before this board. Mr. Rymarczyk stated his department received a complaint and the inspector saw that it is located in a non conforming area. Mr. Gomersall asked why the fence structure was not put in the back of the house. Mrs. Schmotzer stated we were going to put up a fence but because it is a corner lot and aesthetically it would not look well we chose this chain link enclosure. As for the reason the enclosure is on the side of the house, there is no door on the back of the house. Mr. Gomersall asked if there were any further questions from the board. No further questions were asked. W. Kremzar moved to grant Arthur Schmotzer, 5776 Park Ridge Road. The request for variance (1123.12). To have a non-permauent chain link enclosure on the side ofthe house, said enclosure would intrude nineteen (19) feet into the required twenty-five (25) foot setback. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.06 (B). The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Variance Granted