My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/23/1999 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission
>
11/23/1999 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:56 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 3:38:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1999
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
11/23/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
truck it is to mainly there to hide the dumpsters, trash compactors and the site free of trash. He <br />suggested that he had never indicated that the wall would ever hide a truck. Mrs. O'Rourke <br />questioned what would be placed in the glass windows in front of the buildina. Mr. Wajtila <br />commented that the fake windows would be lit for effect but would not be used for display. Mrs. <br />O'Rourke questioned if the windows would be used for advertisement or any form of display. <br />NIr. Wajtila indicated that the windows would only be used for appearance purposes. Mrs. <br />Henson, a concerned neighbor sucrgested that she was concerned that the lit sign at the entrance <br />would not be enough. She questioned if a street light could be put in place to light up the <br />intersection, as there were quite a few children on bikes in the area during the summer months. <br />Mr. Tallon suggested the landscaped lights and ballard lights would be used to protect the <br />residents from to many lights. Mrs. Henson commented that she felt that a pole light should be <br />used to light up the sidewalks to make sure the children on bikes are safe. NIr. Tallon suggested <br />landscape type lights would illuminate about 3 feet high, which should be enough lijhting to <br />illuminate the sidewalks. Mrs. Henson questioned if the rear-buffering wall would be 3 or 4 feet <br />high. Mr. Wajtila commented that there would be a 4-foot brick wall along the south side of the <br />site. Mr. Bolman questioned if the board could recommend the utility poles be removed from <br />Decker to the other side of Butternut Ridge Road and the utility line placed underground. It <br />would help the applicants building stand out and enhance the appearance of the entire intersection. <br />Mr. Bolman indicated that he would be happy to give the applicants the name and phone number <br />of the person they would have to get in touch with, so they could get a price before they go <br />before the Board of Zoning and Development. Mr. Tallon indicated that he would make two <br />motions, as there were quite a few variances that would be needed for the site. He believed that <br />the applicants had done all they could to eliminate as many variances as they could, but the lot is <br />such that variances will be needed. Mr. Conway indicated that he would like to clarify that when <br />he determined the variances, for example the rear setback he was goinc, to the property line of the <br />single family lot that will be used for parking. He does not know what the intention of the <br />developer or the Commissions is as far as combining the 3 lots to?ether. Nor was he aware if the <br />issue had even been discussed. Mr. Tallon suggested that combining the lots had not been <br />discussed. Mr. Conway indicated that then the board was looking at the most sever requirements <br />as far as the rear setbacks. <br />R. Tallon motioned to recommend to the Board of Zoning Appeals the following building <br />setbacks, a 63 foot front setbaclc, 40 foot east side setback, 36 foot west rear side setback and <br />rear setback. Parking setbacks, front 13 feet, east side 8 feet, west side 5 feet and rear 10 feet. <br />The setback on the drive-thru 10 feet, and Lorain Road entrance 11 feet and 6 foot on Porter <br />Road entrance. The board recommends that the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the above <br />variances needed. The motion was seconded by R. Koeth and unanimously approved. Motion <br />Carried. <br />R. Tallon motioned to approve CVS Pharmacy; PP#'s 235-11-009 to 013 and 235-11-047 their <br />proposal which consists of demolition of three existing buildings and the construction of a new <br />10,125 square foot retail pharmacy. All parcels are zoned for this use except one which is <br />currently used for parking and will remain as such. The proposal will include the removal of the <br />signs on the southeast side of the building, south west side of the building and the monument sign <br />on the south side of the Porter Road driveway. The addition of landscaped type ballard lighting <br />on the driveway to illuminate it without causing undue lighting pollution to the neighbors. The <br />sign on the north side of the Porter driveway is an enter sign and the applicants can illuminate the <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.