11/23/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

sign if they wish. The applicants are to get in touch with the Service Director, Mr. Bloman to acquire the name and phone number of the CEI contact to make arrangements to remove the utility poles. In the framing of the motion Mr. Conway questioned the Chairman of the Architectural Review Board, Mr. Zergott, as he was present, if the Architectural Review Board reviewed the sign package. Mr. Zergott indicated that they had not reviewed the sign package like the Planning Commission just did. Mr. Tallon indicated that the sign package would be sent to the Architectural Review Board for review and to follow the recommendations without returning to the Planning Commission. NIr. Zergott questioned if the landscaping suagestions yvere made. Mr. Zimmerman commented that all the recommendations on landscaping were made to improve the site. R. Tallon remarked that the motion would include all the recommendations made by the Architectural Review Board as well as the Landmarks Commissions. Mr. Ziinmerman suggested that the Architectural Review Board had not reviewed the sign package in depth. Mr. Wajtila questioned if the signage would delay the building going before Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. Conway indicated that the sign package could be addressed as a separate issLie. Mr. Self suggested that the signage could not have been designed until the building was designed. The building and signage permits should be addressed at the same time at the Board of Zui;ing Appeals meeting. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned if the awning over the brick area would be lit. Mr. Zimmerman indicated that only the windows would be lit. Mr. Zergott indicated that the Arcilitectural Review Board disagreed with the traffic engineer as they felt that the drive-thru wo,!id be a safety issue with motorists turning onto Porter Road. Mr. Tallon reviewed that at the first meetina the drive-thru was addressed and the traffic engineer believes that it would not be a safe:y issue. The motion was seconded by T. Brennan and unanimously - approved. Motion C,is riec9. Mr. Tallon thanked the applicants for their time and willingness to work with the City an'd its Commissions to develop a building that would best suit the community. IV. N-EW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: No items. V. C'OLNEVRJNICATIONS: No items. VI. COMNIITTEE REPORTS: I'he Planning Commissioners will need to review the following ordinances: 1). Ordinance No. 99-139: An ordinance creating new chapter 1140 of the Planning and Zoning code of the City of North Olmsted, entitled "Public Facilities Overlay District." Note: The Planning Commission tabled this ordinance at the November 9, 1999 meeting. Chairman Tallon indicated that ordinance 99-139 and 99-140 would be reviewed at the same time. Mr. Tallon indicated that there was a lengthy discussion at the last meeting and the discussion will be limited. The board will allow audience members to speak but not to the length that was allowed at the last meeting. He questioned if there was anyone present in the audience that did not have a chance to speak at the last meeting and indicated that the audience would speak first. The board will review the overlay district ordinance, which is self-explanatory, it over lays the current zoning, and it is placed on top of the existing zoning and does not replace the current zoning. It allows uses that are not normally allowed. At the end of the last meeting he had asked the RTA rep to come forward and address the intrusions on the environment whether it be sound or air pollution. Mr. Asseff indicated that once the overlay district is created it could be 5