My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/09/1999 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission
>
11/09/1999 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:47:56 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 3:38:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1999
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
11/9/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
., <br />?- . <br />As Mr. Brennan suggested there are 1 or 2 trucks parking behind the Best building every day. <br />The residents have been given numbers by RTA indicating that there will be 10 buses an hour <br />every day. The point of extraordinary buffering methods is well taken and should be addressed by <br />the commission as an extraordinary buffering challenge. This will not be the Fairview, Westlake <br />or Strongsville park and ride, but it will be next to our homes. , It is not a parking lot but a park <br />and ride, the and part of that title brings large diesel buses too and from the City of Cleveland to <br />our homes. From his perspective and many of the residents here tonight it is not about how many <br />residents from North Olmsted the buses will serve. Regardless if it is the good for our City or any <br />other county it makes no difference, because he is not willing to sacrifice his property value, <br />lungs, hearing and the comfort of his home. There have been numerous talks with RTA regarding <br />designs such as moving the wall and buffering which they always aaree to do, yet tonight RTA <br />has brought the exact same drawing. Ms. Feke iridicated earlier that the issue is urgent enough to <br />be addressed by the board now, as at this point they will just have enough time to get the proposal <br />completed when their lease expires. If it is that urgent and they are really interested in their <br />neighbors concerns then they would have made the changes to the drawings to appease the <br />residents three months ago, but they have not. Mr. Break indicated that he had contacted <br />Council, the Mayor as well as others for direct support for the residents on this issue. Some <br />understanding of what the residents can do and how they should proceed and he has gotten no <br />assistance, direction or help. It feels like a railroad, the board can say they represent us, but they <br />only represent us when they act like they represent the residents by hearing our voices, giving us a <br />voice to get it managed the way we want it managed. We are not saying throw it out, they are <br />not going to build their own residential houses there but it is slipping away from us. He doesn't <br />know what an overlay district is or what it does to their position. He indicated that Mayor Musial <br />informed him they have no position, as no one would build a residential home along the highway. <br />So the residents have lost that position, go further there is a public facility overlay district <br />ordinance on the books that is for the RTA park and ride and other government ofFices. A missal <br />test range is a government office is that included in the overlay, he doesn't know. They need their <br />goveriunent to tell them what is right for this property and how it should be manaaed. He is <br />asking again for help in protecting the resident's interests and can they do something with RTA to <br />make sure they get a plan that they like, before the ordinance is.passed. Until the residents get <br />some respect, dialog and some mechanism so the City can lead us the residents to the right <br />answer. Councilman McKay indicated that Mr. Brennan pretty much summed up what he had in <br />inind. He is on record as not wanting to change residential zonirig, however this is not changing <br />the zoning of the residential it is just permitting a government overlay. A government overlay is <br />an overlay that just about permits anything in government use, such as school, education, RTA <br />and other things for government use. He does support a government overlay 99-139, but he <br />doesn't support 99-140, which places the overlay district over the parcels mentioned. Council has <br />been told that the property will be rezoned at some point in time because the parcels are so close <br />to an interchange to remain residential. He commented that he had just spent three days at the <br />court house regarding parcel E and the way it looks the City may have to go into an appeals court <br />to get things worked out. In the City of North Olmsted there is enough retail and commercial <br />property, but there is not enough government land as the City could use more recreational <br />facilities. There is certainly enough commercial and retail zoning, there is 150 square feet for <br />every man woman and child in this City and the national average is 19 square feet so there is an <br />over abundance of that type of zoning. It appears that it is always his ward that gets the <br />9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.