10/12/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4 space on the north side. Mrs. Henson, from Decker road questioned if the parking lot would be up to her property line and whai would be put in place to keep traffic out or her yard. Mr. Zimmerman reviewed that mounds would be put in place as well as landscaping. Mrs. Henson commented that she wanted to make sure her children would be safe in their own backyard. Mr. Zimmerman indicated that there would be a brick walUfence and landscaping. Mr. Henson aslced about deliverers. Mr. Wojtila remarked that deliveries would be make in the daytime working hours. Mr. Tallon inquired if the brick wall would have mounding. Mr. Zimmerman indicated that the amount of space between the pavement and wall would not allow mounding. Mr. Talon indicated that the brick wall should be 4 feet high and should continue around the back south side and then up. Mr. Koeth reviewed that there would be a 4-foot brick wall and landscaping. Mr. Henson questioned were the brick wall would be. Mr. Tallon reviewed were the wall would be placed. Mr. Zimmerman suggested that the brick wall could be placed in front of the landscaped area. Mr. Tallon questioned what type of parking lot lighting. NIr. Zimmerman indicated that there would only be 1 or 2 standard pole lights as the decorative lighting will produce enough light. Mr. Tallon indicated that the board wanted the pole lights to be less than 20 feet high and read zero at the lot line. He further suggested using antique type lights in the parking lot to make it easier on the abutting residents. Mr. Koeth suggested putting the lights along the south property line with the back of the lights towards the neighbors. Mr. Zimmerman agreed. R. Tallon motioned to send CVS Pharmacy; PP#'s 235-11-009 to 013 and 235-11-047 which consists of the demolition of three existing buildings and the construction of a new 10,125 square foot retail pharmacy. All parcels are zoned for this use except one which is currently used for parking and will remain as such to the Architectural Review Board for their comments. The board would like the traffic engineer to look at the driveway, as well as the safety department. When the proposal returns the board would like to see a 4 foot brick wall added to the agreed area, the pedestrian access on I,orain Road in its new location, a lighting photometrics which shows the proposed pole lights, and a sample of the proposed sign package. The proposal will return October 26, 1999 if the applicants are ready. The motion was seconded by K. O'Rourke and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. In the framing of the motion Mr. Conway commented that he would need the details of the sign package prior to the Architectural Review Board meeting, so that the sign inspector could calculate whether or not variances might be required. The clerk announced the date and time of the Architectural Review Board meeting and indicated that no further notices would be sent out. 6). J.C. Hair Design28813 Lorain Road: Proposal consists of land banked parking. Chairman Tallon called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Ms. Kopko, the architect and Mr. Christou the owner came forward to present their proposal. Ms. Kopko indicated that the proposal was before the Planning Commission for the second time as the surveyor miscalculated the garage. The garage is further east than what was originally shown. There are now 2 additional parkuig spaces required so the owner would need to use the landbank axea now. She indicated that Mr. Christou had spoken to his abutting neighbors and they have indicated that they would not allow his customers to park in their lots. Mr. Conway reviewed that as the building is farther east then what was originally indicated some problems 8