Laserfiche WebLink
the site of the proposed number 16-cluster home. Mr. Koeth questioned if there was presently a <br />driveway located on the Louis drive parcel. The board members reviewed with Mr. Bower the <br />location and entrance of the existing home. An urudentified audience member asked why the <br />audience couldn't hear what was being asked. Mr. Tallon reviewed that there was an existing <br />bridge and the board wanted clarification on the bridge and what was going to be done. The <br />audience member indicated that he didn't feel the board members should be talking with the <br />developer when the audience couldn't hear what was being said. Mr. Tallon commented that <br />the board members were getting clarification as to where a few things were located and as soon <br />as they were done he would review what was said with the audience. An unidentified women <br />commented that this was the first time she had ever attended a Planning Commission meeting <br />and all the cases that were before the board prior to Mr. Bowers the board never talked with the <br />developer the way they were with iVlr. Bower. NIa-. Tallon explained that the existing access <br />was a bridge over the creek and the board was trying to determine on the prini were it went and <br />how it would be replaced. The prints were light and Mr. Bower lives there so he was asked to <br />show the board members on the plans were certain things were. Mr. Tallon questioned if the <br />house that will remain would have access through the cluster homes. Mr. Bower indicated that <br />was correct; it would not have access on L,ouis Drive. Mr. Tallon questioned if the access on <br />Louis drive would be removed and a single family home built on the site. He further questioned <br />if the lot would meet the codes to accommodate a home. Mr. Bower again indicated that Mr. <br />Tallon was correct and that he believed that the lot would not meet the code requirements. Mr. <br />Tallon suggested the plans indicated that there was a total of 5 acres. He questioned if the <br />number of units would be a total of 23 units. Mr. Bower suggested that 3 would be a <br />reconfiguration of 3 clusters in the existing development' and 20 additional units added to the <br />new site. Mr. Spalding questioned if the entire 5.1444 acres would have to be rezoned or if <br />only a portion of the land needs to be rezoned. Mr. Bower indicated that 4.9 would need to be <br />rezoned cluster the additional land is part of the golf course complex that would have to be <br />attached to have access to the cluster homes, which together makes the parcel 5.1444 acres. <br />Mr. Bower indicated that part of the golf course would be combined with the new cluster <br />homes. Mr. Conway indicated that the golf course land would not be rezoned they will be <br />taking common land from the golf course and incorporating it into an access. He suggested that <br />the golf course was currently zoned cluster. Mr. Spalding questioned if tlie entire golf course <br />was currently zoned cluster. Mr. Conway indicated that he believed the vahole developmenfi <br />was rezoned cluster when it was first started. Mr. Spalding commented that he would be <br />interested in the original plans that were first brought before the city. He would like to know <br />the exact areas zoning such as what is zoned golf course and what was cluster or was it all <br />inclusive or was it separated. Mr. Conway commented that it was viewed as one entire project <br />under separate ownership. Mr. Spalding questioned what was one entire project. Mr. Conway <br />indicated that it was all as one golf course and cluster homes. Mr. Spalding commented that <br />then the golf course was then part of the development. Mr. Conway indicated correct it is part <br />of the common area, but under separate ownerslup. Mr. Spalding questioned how there could <br />be separate ownership. Mr. Conway commented that there was notlung in the code that <br />indicates there can not be multiple owners in a cluster development. Mr. Spalding reviewed <br />then the golf course was combined by the City to be part of the cluster development. Mr. <br />Conway commented that was correct the golf course acreage was part of the density quotient <br />for the original development. Mr. Spalding indicated that the golf course was the bases to <br />11