09/14/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? T. Brennan motion to approve the Foreman, Consolidation Plat which consists of combining permanent parcel Nos. 235-14-007, 008, and 235-14-009 (formerly different owners) located on the east side of Burns Road south of Midvale Avenue, into one (1) parcel. Zoning is "B"- Residence, Single entirely and proposal conforms to Zoning Code Requirements for lot area, frontage, and depth. The motion was seconded by W. Spalding and unanimously approved. Motion Granted. V. COMMUNICATIONS: The Planning Commission will need to review the following ordinances: 1). Ordinance No. 99-106: An ordinance creating new section 1139.12 of the North Olmsted Zoning Code regulating the location of free-standing industrialized units on commercial property. 2). Ordinance No. 99-109: An ordinance creating new section 1139.13 of the North Olmsted Zoning Code regulation outdoor, enclosed storage of motor vehicles at motor vehicle repair facilities. 3). Ordinance No. 99-110: An ordinance creating new section 1119.06 of the North Olmsted Zoning Code requiring that developers report certain income tax information to the city prior to obtaining occupancy permits following commercial construction or new residential construction in the city. VI. CONIIVIITTEE REPOR'I'S: VII. MINOR CHANGES: VIII. NEW BU5INESS: IX. OLD BUSINES S : Mr. Tallon asked the representatives from Mill Garden Condominium to come forward. Ms. More indicated that see was the secretary for the Mill Garden Condominiums and had lived in her condominium for over 20 years as well as the other condo owners. Ms. More read allowed a letter that was submitted to the clerk. (Said letter is attached to the back of these minutes). Ms. Mr. Tallon questioned if the condominium members knew that the Olmsted Mannor proposal had already been reviewed and passed. Ms. More indicated that none of the condo owners had been notified. Mr. Tallon indicated that he assumed that was why the representatives were present. He indicated that the clerk would have to check the files, as the board members did not presently have the case file before them. Mr. Tallon indicated that the clerk would check the case file and the Law Department would make a ruling on whether the contact list was correct or not. Ms. More indicated that there was not one condo owner that was notified and she believed that anyone within 500 feet of the proposal property should have been notified. Mr. Tallon reiterated his earlier comment that the clerk would check the files. Ms. More asked if anyone could tell her who was notified. The clerk indicated that she did not presently have the case file before her, but she would check the file and Ms. More was welcome to a copy of the notices that were sent out. 21