02/23/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

sanctuary, new classrooms and offices. With the following additions, the lighting be sodium type with a 0" foot candles at the lot line. The mechanical devices to be at, or below the noise level set by ordinance and shielded properly. The drainage to be worked out with the City Engineering Department. There will be windows allowed on the rear classrooms. The rear entrance lighting will be down lighting or soffit type lighting. The Board will move this proposal on and the light changes will be submitted to the Building department prior to any permits being issued. That the mechanical equipment meets the decibel levels or is below. The motion was seconded by, S. Asseff and tmanimously approved. Motion Carried. The clerk reviewed that once the required material is submitted and approved the next meeting for Mr. Shirkey would be the Board of Zoning and Development, and he would be contacted once the date is set. Mr. McKay came forward and asked to be allowed to make a few comments. He indicated he went to the Arclutectural Review Board meeting, at which time the suggestion of increasing the mounds from 3'feet to 5'feet was made. He would also like to ask that some pine trees be added to the mounds, and to thicken up the screening. He believed that the storm water drainage would not be connected to the sewer designed a few years ago, but will connect to the sewer that ties into Rocky River Drive. He asked that the Engineering department practice caution and check the sanitary sewer line to make sure it can handle the increase. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS ANID SUBDIVISIONS: 1). Retail Todav Lot Split: Proposal is to split Permanent parcel No. 237-09-001, which has frontage on both Lorain Road and Clague Road, into two (2) parcels. Zoning is General Retail Business District entirely, and each proposed parcel conforms to zoning code requirements for area and frontage of General Retail requirements. Note: Variances may be required. Chairman Tallon called all interested parties forward and reviewed the variances being requested NIr. Waorner, came forward to present Retail Today's proposal, and indicated the site was originally developed for a Kroeger drugstore. In the last year this site was home to Goodwill. Eight months ago they were before the Planning Commission with regards to CVS Pharmacies, which is currently open and sits on the northern portion of the lot. The building that was home to Goodwill has been demolished and the pad it once stood upon is the section they seek to split off. Mr. Wagner reviewed a letter addressed from the Building Commissioner. 1) The south line now becomes a side lot line with a 50' foot setbaclc requirement to the structure and an increase in the landscaping butler from 15'feet to 20'feet. 2) The front of the parcel will now be on Clague Road, and the building setback will have to be increased to 75'feet. 3) The eastern property line becomes the rear lot line requiring an increase in the building setback from 10'foot to 25'foot with a 10'foot- landscaping Uuffer. 4) The north property line becomes a sideline and would require a 10'foot- landscaping buffer when developed to both building and parking. Mr. Wagner suggested the proposed lot split there is an easement, which is between the northern property line of the southern parcel, and the southern property line of the northern parcel. The 10'foot cross easement would allow a 20'foot buffer to share parking or any type of easements that may be needed. 5) In addition, Parcel "B" does not conform to a freestanding restaurant (1.5 acres). 6) The new rear lot line created for the CVS store on Parcel "A" puts the existing canopy in violation of the rear yard setback requirements. A 25' foot is required and 11'.21 feet provided. Further, there is no 10'foot rear- landscaping buffer. If the developer can not bring these into compliance by moving the lot line, variances would need to be granted. (1139.07 table) The owners have chosen to acquire the variance needed per the Boards recommendation. The variance needed for the existing canopy would be off set by the easement that they are proposing for the site. Mr. Wagner