02/23/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

suggested his drawing is an updated drawing that was made after receiving the Building Commissioners letter. Mr. Tallon asked if the variance for the canopy is the only variance needed. Mr. Wagner suggested no other variances would be needed. Mr. Brennan asked what would be put on lot "B". Mr. Wagner sugaested it would be used for marketing, and presently they don't have a set plan. NIr. Rymarczyk asked if the lot would be plowed, graded, and seeded before May 1, 1999. Mr. Wagner indicated it would be done. The reason for this parcel split is strictly financiaL Mr. Rymarczyk questioned what would be done about the ground sign once the property is divided. Mr. Wagner suggested the sign would be used for both occupants. 1VIr. Brennan reviewed that the cross easeinent needed for the shared parking would eliminate any side yard setback. Mr. Wagner suggested Mr. Brennan was correct. NIr. Rymarczyk asked if there was any intent to continue the fence. Mr. Wagner suggested at this point no, once a new tenant is found they could look into having them continue the fence. Mr. Brennan asked why the change from the last time you came before this board. Mr. Wagner suggested because Goodwill is not returning to the site. Triple AAA indicated they wanted to put a travel agency in place, but has now backed out. Mr. Asseff indicated a travel agent would be good for the lot size. NIr. Wagner indicated they are marketing the lot now and would like to lease it out as soon as possible. Mr. Tallon reviewed that the lot could not accommodate a restaurant as any restaurant would need variances. R. Tallon motioned to send Retail Today on to the Board of Zoning Appeals, and aslc that they approve the variance needed for the canopy. The proposal for the lot split of Permanent parcel No. 237-09-001, which has frontage on both Lorain Road and Clague Road, into two (2) parcels Zonin? is General Retail Business District entirely, and each proposed parcel conforms to zoning code requirements for area and frontage of General Retail requirements, and is based on the granting of the variance by the Board of Zoning Appeals. The proposed lot split is contingent upon variance approval. The motion was seconded by, T. Brennan and unanimously approved. 1VIotion Cari-ied. The clerk advised that the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting they could attend would be April 1, 1999, and no further notices would be sent out. V. CONIlVICTNICATIONS: No items. VI. COIVIlVIITTEE REPORTS: No items. VII. MIiNOR CHANGES: Mr. Tallon asked Mr. Rymarczyk if there were any ininor changes to review. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated the automotive repair place by the post office would like to put a couple of dormers on the side. He believes a letter was sent out to Mr. Tallon and the time to respond was almost up. Mr. Tallon suggested he had not received a letter regarding the case but had reviewed it with Mr. Gareau, and would check his box again. Mr. Rymarczyk suggested the letters were sent out the 12 of February and Mr. Gareau approved it, and Architectural Review Board recommended the dormer be larger then what they are showing. Mr. Tallon suggested he would contact Mr. Rymarczyk in the morning about it. VIII. NEW BUSINESS: Mr. Tallon reviewed that Pursuant to Ohio R. C. 3735.69, there is hereby established the North Olmsted Housing Council to act as the community reinvestment area housing council. The Council shall be composed of seven members who shall be appointed as follows: two members shall be appointed by the Mayor; two members shall be appointed by the Council; one member shall be