07/01/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

..??i J. Konold motioned to approve Mr. & Mrs. Hoffa of 30000 Westrninster Drive their request.for variance (1123.12). Which consists of a shed and that the following variance be granted: 1). A 5 foot rear yard variance (code requires lOft setback, applicant shows Sft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 D4). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Variance Granted. Timot? Williams; 25 838 Byron Drive: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of addition to existing home. The following variance is required: 1) A 15 foot rear yard setback variance (code requires SOft, applicant shows 35ft. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.08 A). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward and reviewed the variances being requested. Mr. Williams the owner and IVIr. Mizak from Leader Builders forward to present their proposal. Mr. Gomersall indicated that he didn't have a problem with the proposal and asked if there were any further comments from the board members or the audience. No further comments were made. J. Konold motioned to approve Timothy Williams of 25838 Byron Drive his request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of an addition to the existing home and that the following variance be granted: 1) A 15 foot rear yard setback variance (code requires SOft, applicant shows 35ft. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.08 A). The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Variance Granted. TerrXZeager; 23723 Vincent Dr.: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of eYpanding the existing garage. The following variance is requested: 1) A 12 foot variance for front yard setback (code requires SOft, applicant shows 38ft). Wluch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.06 A). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward. As there was no one present to present the proposal Mr. Gomersall indicated he would call the proposal again after the remaining cases were heard. Note: After the remaining proposals were heard Mr. Gomersall aslced if there was anyone present to represent Terry Zeager. As there was no one in the audience to come forward, Mr. Gomersall asked the clerk to contact Mr. Zeager to let him know that his proposal would be heard at the next regularly scheduled meeting. Which would be August 5, 1999, at 7:30pm and a representative would need to be present. 10. James Blake; 23916 Elm Road: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of a swiminulg pool. The following variances are required: 1) A variance to install a swimming pool less than the required front building setback for the abutting lot on the side street. (1135.02 D 5) 2) A 1.5 square foot variance for total area of rear yard accessory structure (code allows 852.5sq ft, applicant shows 854sq ft) (1135.02 D 2). Note: pool would be installed in the rear yard area behind a 6ft board on board privacy fence. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1135.02 D 2& 5). Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward and reviewed the variances being requested. Mr. Blake came forward to present his proposal. Mr. Gomersall reviewed that the drawing was well done and indicted that there was no one presently located behind Mr. Blake's home. Mr. Maloney indicated that he felt there was not a safety factor as the pool would be located behind a fence and that the location of the pool would be fine. No further comments were made. 4