07/01/1999 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e something the church could do about the drivers being so reckless. Mr. Mac indicated that he would speak to the parents at the daycare about their driving. .. J. Maloney motioned to approve North Olmsted Assembly of God Church of 3874 Columbia Road their request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of expanding existing gravel parking area and that the following variances be granted: 1) A variance not to install a concrete or bituminous concrete pavement parking lot or provide drainage or curbing for the same as required by the zoning code, (1161.11). 2) A 15 foot variance for sideyard setback (code requires 20ft setback, applicant shows Sft) (1118.02 (2 C). 3) A 15 foot variance for rear yard setback (code requires 20ft setback, applicant shows Sft) (1118.02 (2 C). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1161.11) and (1118.02 (2 C). The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Variances Granted. Mr. Gareau indicated that he would like to review a few of the issues regarding the Timberview home proposal. He indicated that a variance was not needed for the width of the lot. Therefore the 22ft variance should not be before this board. There is a provision in the zoning code, which addresses the use of non-conforming lots. A non-conformixig lot can be used, provided that all the other zoning code requirements are met. If the 22 foot variance was denied the board would be indicating the lot could not be used. That is not the purpose of the zoning code. This is an issue that has come up in the past. He further indicated that the second variance request (A 4,150 square foot variance for lot area) also be removed froin the applicants request as it is also addressed in the zoning code tmder use of non confornung lots. Mr. Gareau indicated that the only variances the Board of Zoning Appeals board would need to address regarding Timberview Homes was issues 3, 4, 5, and 6 only. 12. Timberview Homes (Curt Dtullap); 6123 Decker Road: Request for variance (1123.12). Proposal consists of building a home. The following variances are requested: . 1) A 22 foot variance for lot width (B-district lot to be 70ft wide, applicant shows 48ft wide) (1135.05 A). 2) A 4,150 square foot variance for lot area (B-district lot to be 10,850sq ft, applicant shows 6,700sq ft) (1135.05 A. 3) An 8 foot variance for front setback (code requires SOft applicant shows 42ft) (1135.06 A). 4) A 2 foot variance for north side yard setback (Where they would only have Sft and 7 ft would be required to have 15ft between adjacent dwellings) (1135.07 A). 5) A 9 foot variance for side yard setback of a comer lot (code requires 25ft applicant shows 9ft) (1135.06 B). 6) A 166 square foot variance for minimum livable first floor area (code requires .850sq ft, applicant shows 684sq ft, second floor shows 928sq ft) (1135.03 B). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1135.03 B), (1135.05 A), (1135.06 B) and (1135.07 A). Note: Lot coverage is only at 16%. - Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward and reviewed the variances being requested. Mr. Dunlap, the Builder, Mr. Khicar, the owner of the property, and Mrs. Phillips, a concerned neighbor, came forward. Mr. Gomersall commented that the first two write-ups are not needed so only variance requests 3, 4, 5, and 6, would be addressed. Mr. Dunlap indicated that the lot is 49.91 feet wide by 140 feet deep. He showed a picture of a home on Porter Road, which would be the same style as the proposed home for Decker Road. It will be a 3 bedroom 1 1/2 bath with a full basement. Mr. Gomersall asked if Mr. Klucar would be living in the house or selling the lot. Mr. Klucar indicated that he was in the process of selling the lot to Timberview Homes. Mr. Dunlap indicated that the sale of the lot is contingent upon the vanances being granted. Mrs. Phillips indicated that she was concerned about the number of trees that would be removed from the lot and that there was presently a traffic problem. Adding this small of a driveway would only add parking problems. The lot is a corner lot and if the new owners have company they will have to park in the street. Mr. Dunlap indicated that the driveway would be a full size driveway. Mr. Koberna commented that he agreed with Mrs. Phillips that because of the school, which is located near Decker Road there, is an existing traffic problem. Mrs. Phillips conunented that, there has been concerns in the City about the amowit of trees that are being removed and she is 6