07/06/2000 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, ;. shed is moved to the other side of the yard, it would block the natural flow of water from the swell. Mr. Gomersall believed that the shed would add to the water trouble that presently existed. He questioned why the shed would not be placed in the opposite side of the property. Mr. Van Sach commented that he chose the area for the shed so that it would be in line with the neighbors' shed and so that the neighbor would not have to see it right outside his window. Mrs. Van Sach believed the area they chose was the best place for the shed and the least obtrusive. 1VIr. Gomersall questioned how the shed and area around the shed would be maintained. Mr. Van Sach suggested that being 3feet from the fence and planting flowers around the shed would give them plenty of room to maintain the shed. Mr. Gomersall indicated that he would like to see the shed placed on the other side of the yard. Mr. Van Sach indicated that the shed had to be placed in the highest spot in the yard. Mr. Gomersall questioned what type of gutters tlie applicants would be putting on the shed. Mrs. Van Sach commented that the kit did not come with gutters but they would be willing to put gutters on the shed. The board members discussed the trees and roots of the trees that hindered were the shed could be placed. No further- comments were made. J. Konold motioned to approve David John Van Sach of 5059 Douglas Dr. his request for variance 1123.12. Which consists of a shed arid that the following variances be granted: 1. A 7 foot variance for rear yard setback (code requires lOft, applicant shows 3ft). 2. A 2-foot variance for side yard setbacks (code requires Sft, applicant shows 3 ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, section 1135.02 d 4. The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Vaa-iances Granted. 2. Bd & Marv Zarefoss; 28405 N. Park Dr. Request for variance 1123 ,12. The proposal consists of construction of accessory structure. The following variances are requested: l. A 300 foot variance for accessory structure (code permits 200 square feet, applicant shows 500 square feet), section 1135.02 (d)(1). 2. A 2 foot (plus) variance for height of structure (code permits 12 feet, applicant shows 14 foot (plus)), section 1135.02 (d) (3), Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125, sections 1135.02 (d) (1) and (d) (3). NOTE: Plans shall be drawn to scale and shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the extent of work to be done prior to issuing a building permit. NOTE: Due to a clerical error, this proposal is being reviewed a second time. Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties forward to review the variances requested. The oath was administered to Mr. & Mrs. Zarefoss the owners; and Mr. & Mrs. Zimamn concerned neighbors each of whom came forward to review the request. Mr. Zarefoss indicated that new plans for the utility shed had been submittecl to the building department and the height of the shed would-no 1Dnger be an issue. The pitch will be a four twelve pitch, so the height will not be higher than 12 feet. Mr. Maloney questioned if there would only be a service door and 2