My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/25/2000 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission
>
07/25/2000 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:19 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 4:21:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2000
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/25/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
to add to the building and then a continuous cornice that runs around the building. Which has <br />been the one feature in lookirig in past designs which has really added to the buildings. From that, <br />the building will be surrounded by landscaping which will soften the major areas. The other item <br />has to do with the palate board of colors, which they have chosen and feel is complementary to <br />the mall. We also have an 8-foot high parapet, which screens the rooftop units. There are three <br />exterior signs, which will be 380 square feet per sign, and then there will be a little sign above the <br />canopies. A palate board was presented to the board members. It shows samples of spandrel <br />glass, granite that will be at the doors, standing seem roof colors, the colors and textures of the <br />E.F.I.S. materials as well as the brick. Mr. Cassiere: The masonry brick, which they have picked <br />out, matches the brick color of the mall very closely. Mr. Rinker: If I can, I thought it would be <br />useful if we have each individual just go through some points. He asked Mr. Loesch to explain <br />the mall addition and some of the features that have gone into that because they are two different <br />segments. Mr. Loesch: On the west elevation right at the end of the existing building we will fill <br />in between the end of the existing building now and the distance to the new Dillard's building. <br />The same brown masonry will be continued which you see in the photographs. There will not be <br />multiple colors on the mall addition. The same tan band will be carried with dark brick below it, in <br />addition the sidewalk will continue and landscaping will be added to fill in the space between the <br />two buildings. There will be illuminations at the entrance on the wall and we would like to <br />replace it all with a little brighter lights (100watt). The same thing happens on the other side of <br />the Wall, there will be 60-70 feet of masonry wall. Mr. Rymarczyk: The building department will <br />need a cut sheet of the lights. Mr. Tallon: Has the Commission's office received a copy of the <br />landscaping plan that would be used around the mall addition. Clerk: Yes Sir, you received a <br />copy of the landscaping plan in the plans that were at your seat tonight. Mr. Tallon: Will the solid <br />wall only be done in the dark Brown brick? Why wouldn't the pattern be continued on the new <br />edition of the mall. 1V1r. Loesch: The reason the pattern will not be continued is that it is only <br />used near an entrance. Mr. Spalding: How far is the distance between the addition and Dillard's? <br />Mr. Loesch: "140 feet". Mr. Tallon: You will be continuing for 60-feet or whatever, the brick <br />band to match the existing building. Mr. Loesch: It will be 140feet. Mr. Tallon: "140 feet <br />whatever it is"! It appears to me that you ought to continue that pattern to your doorway. It also <br />appears that you should continue the brick all the way. Also the abrupt squaring of the building <br />and exaggerated height of the building, I would like to see some type of breakdown from one <br />level to the next. Mr. Rinker: Are you talking about all elevations or one particular elevation. <br />Mr. Tallon:,Right the top elevation, look at the top elevation. Mr. Rinker: What area is Mr. <br />Tallon Talking about, as I am not clear. Mr. Tallon: You are going to continue the brick all the <br />way over to your door. Mr. Rinker: What are you talking about this door? Mr. Tallon: Yes, also <br />the abruptness of the buildings, the steps to the buildings there should be some kind of step down <br />so you are not just massing in the one building. Mr. Rinker: If I can try to understand. One of the <br />things pointed out to us at the architectural review board, was to try to continue the band in such <br />a way yet recognize the fact that Dillard's building is a distinctive structure. I mean you are into a <br />point where you are competing to stand out. Mr. Tallon: I want the brick the same height as the <br />other brick. Mr. Rinker: That is exactly the point I am trying to make. In all due deference while <br />one argument is you should match them up to get a certain uruformity. The other argument is <br />with uniformity you are blending more than you want to. In fact, there is more of a dramatic <br />statement made not matching. Mr. Tallon: You have a three story building compared to a one <br />story, I do not think there is any blending there at all. What I am saying now is, you have two <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.