Laserfiche WebLink
separate entities and I know Dillard's wants to have its own identity and this one once their own <br />and so on. They all belong to the mall so they have to tie in, so it looks like it all belongs <br />together. They can have their separate identity in their entranceways, and the heights of their <br />buildings. Mr. Rinker: Here I am going to back off, as an attorney again because I am relating to <br />you what was related to me. I think the people that can probably address that is Mr. Yager and <br />Mr. Cassiere. Mr. Cassiere: In our first presentation we had a banding which you will see in the <br />old elevation which was lower at about 12 feet high. At the recommendation of the architectural <br />review board, we raised it up with two different materials. I understand your point of running this <br />along the line and as an architect, I would have to go back to the office and say let me see if we <br />are matching this what would it look like. Mr. Tallon: To be honest with you, I think you should <br />brick the entire building, that is what the mall is and if you would like to use different colored <br />brick like you did there, then that is fine. Use different colored brick but brick the whole <br />building. Make it a structure we can be proud of, we do not want a cheap structure that you just <br />throw up and then it falls apart. Mr. Cassiere: I do not think it is going to fall apart. The material <br />that we will be using is an exterior installation system and Dillard's has had over 20 years of <br />experience working with this material. We have learned things and have stuck with this product. <br />We have found that it is very durable and as far as achieving a quality design and allowing us to <br />do more than what we have ever been able to do before. Mr. Tallon: That is a plain wall, what is <br />unique about that? Mr. Rinker: If, I can interject! I think it is appropriate to understand what the <br />question is and what the assumption is. What I am hearing, and this is not the first time I have <br />heard this, so we will try to hit it squarely. The perception is that by using the other material it <br />somehow cheapens the look. Is that correct? Mr. Tallon: Yes exactly, it makes it aesthetically <br />less, the thing is we have a structure here that is entirely brick. Why would we want to stick <br />something on it that does not even correlate to that. Mr. Rinker: The question that I will ask you <br />is, have you ever beeri to Beachwood Mall. Mr. Tallon: I do not care about Beachwood Mall. I <br />care about Great Northern mall. Mr. Rinker: I understand that, but I am suggesting that not only <br />Beachwood mall, but also other malls all around the country mix those materials. In fact, what <br />started out as a real resistance in the industry years ago has changed. In the state of Ohio, it is <br />recognized under BOCA (Building Officials and Code Administrators), and in this community, it <br />is recognized as an acceptable building material. Mr. Tallon: I am not disagreeing with that. Mr. <br />Rinker: But what I am saying, is we are getting to the point where one man's fancy may not be <br />that of someone else's. What we are asking is that the city not assume that this is cheap, but on the <br />contrary, the material lends itself to a lot more flexibility. 1VIr. Tallon: We are not talking about <br />dollars and cents. Mr. Rinker: Appearance, which is exactly what I am talking about and we <br />respectfully, disagrees that it cheapens on the contrary. Mr. Tallon: You have your opinion and <br />we have our opinion. Mr. Rinker: It is an opinion that is borne out of 20 years of experience <br />marketing this store, the look of the store is a product, just like everything else. We would not be <br />putting this in front of you and this is all that I have heard from Dillard's, we have looked at this <br />very vigorously as we understood there would be misgivings. The record is there, this is <br />something that has been used and it will last. It is more malleable of a material, the cornice at the <br />top is the E.F.I.S. material that you cannot do with masonry. Even if you look at SouthPark, <br />which has masonry surface you cannot achieve the same esthetic, dramatic impact with masonry <br />that you can with this product. You get to a point, where from the standpoint of your building <br />code requirements, state requirements, it is a material that not only lasts it is durable and lends <br />itself too much more dramatic usage. Are there examples of where people have messed up? <br />4