06/13/2000 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

reviewed that it only has to do with the splitting of two parcels. 1VIrs. O'Rourke reviewed that it was parcel "h" and parcel "f." Mr. Gertsma reviewed that in the end Mr. Lehlbach would have a Columbia Road address. Mr. Spalding questioned if Westlake needed to approve this proposal as well. Mr. Gertsma replied "yes." Mr. Spalding questioned why the proposal hadn't gone to Westlake previous to North Olmsted. Mr. Gertsma indicated that next Monday night the proposal would be heard by the Planning Commission in Westlake. He indicated that North Olmsted is more prompt in response than Westlake. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned if the same family owned parcel "e." Mr. Gertsma indicated "yes." Mr. Gertsma reviewed the proposal indicated that it is a simple lot split. He indicated that this proposal has nothing to do with the Rosewood proposal. At this time, the Board reviewed the blueprints submitted by Mr. Gertsma regarding this proposal and the Rosewood Street proposal. There was then some discussion on where the proposed rerouting of 252 is located. Mr. Gertsma indicated that he had spoken with ODOT and he indicated that ODOT has no interest in the proposed relocated 252. Mr. Tallon questioned if Mr. Gertsma would show where the Rosewood proposal was to take place. Mr. Gertsma indicated the Butcher Lot Split. Mr. Tallon questioned that since the applicant was turned down for the Rosewood proposal that they would do this lot split. Mr. Gertsma reiterated that the two proposals have nothing to do with each other and that it would not be logical. Mr. Spalding indicated that Mr. Lehlbach's property is adjacent to the Rosewood proposal. Mr. Gertsma indicated "yes." Mr. Deichmann indicated that the City is very much interested in the proposed rerouting of 252. Mr. Gertsma indicated that ODOT would not sponsor anything more and that the City would have to sponsor it. Mr. Deichmann indicated that he understood that, but the City is considering this as an option. W. Gertsma indicated that he is not arguing that, but he reiterated that ODOT was not interested. He indicated that Mr. Lehlbach had no plans of building on the property. Mr. Deichmann indicated that the value is less when the parcel is a consolidated parcel rather than an individual. Mr. Gertsma responded that he is not sure of that. He indicated that it was speculation. Chairman Tallon motioned to deny Root Road vacation and Lehlbach Lot Split and Assembly Plat - Revised plan - NOTE: That the proposed items in both cities of Westlake and North Olmsted and requires approval by each city. North Olmsted Item: The proposal is to split permanent parcel numbers 231-19-021 into two (2) sections .of land, (G & H) and each section being joined to adjacent Westlake property. Location is the West Side of Columbia Road, south of the projected intersection with Root Road. Zoning within North Olmsted is B-Itesidence, Single Entirely. Note: this proposal was tabled at the May 23, 2000 Planning Commission meeting for the following reasons, (1) it has a designated road in the middle of it and (2) it does not meet with the City of North Olmsted street plans which he feels is detrimental to the growth of the City of North Olmsted. The motion was seconded by C. Allan and unanimously approved. IViotion C'arriecl. 2. Fairview Corporate Center Lot Split 1'lat; The proposal is to split, at the North Olmsted / Fairview Corporation line, permanent parcel numbers 237-23-023, 025, 037, 041 and 049, land located between Brookpark Rd. (north side) and I-480 (south side), and extending eastward from Clague Road into the City of Fairview Park. Zoning within North Olmsted is Multiple Residence Entirety. NOTE: This