01/11/2000 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?v only be ran during working hours, which is 9:00 am to 9:00pm. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned if variances were needed for signage. Mr. Schill indicated that they would be going before the Board of Zoning Appeals as the signage would require variances. Mr. Koeth inquired if the compactor would be placed in one of the docks. Mr. Schill reviewed that there were currently 3 docks and one would be removed to house the compactor. Mr. Koeth suggested putting the compactor inside the loadina dock. Mr. Green indicated that they couldn't put a compactor in a dock area because a truck is used to dump the compactor and it needs access to the dumpster. Mr. Koeth questioned if the split face block color would be the same as rest of building. . Mr. Schill reviewed that the block color would pick up other light colors in the center and once Michael's lease is up the split face block will be placed on their front entrance. Mr. Schill suggested the owner indicated that there would be one look to the shopping center. Mr. Koeth reviewed that the proposal would need to go before the Board of Zoning Appeals and Architectural Review Board. Mr. Asseff questioned what the applicants owned and questioned if the remainder of the center would match the current color scheme. Mr. Schill indicated that the green is throughout the shopping center and as the tenants are changed or leases renewed the fronts would be changed. Mr. Windbigler a concerned neighbor indicated that he was happy there was not a 24-hour store moving into the building. He questioned if the rear or front lighting would spill over the back property line. Mr. Schill indicated that the liahts on the rear and front of the building would only be down lights. Mr. Windbigler corrunented that the current lights on the rear of the building shined into his kitchen and questioned if the down lights would eliminate that light. Mr. Schill commented that the down lights' would eliminate the light spillage. Mr. Windbigler questioned if Dicks would have deliveries in off-hours. Mr. Green indicated that Dicks had their own delivery trucks and they will only have deliveries during working ours. Mr. Windbigler questioned if _ the furniture store would have a delivery dock. Mr. Schill answered "no". Mr. Windbigler questioned if the noise volume would be regulated. Mr. Rymarczyk reviewed that there are sound ordinances that they would have to follow as well as a construction time that they will have to follow. 1V1r. Windbigler reviewed that he was glad that Dicks was coming and hoped that the residents could have a good relationship with the new tenants. - R. Koeth motioned to approve I3ick's Sporting Goods / Cort Furniture of 4700 Great Northern Blvd. Their proposal which consists of renovating the former Giant Eagle building on Great Northern Blvd to accommodate Dick's Sporting Goods store and Cort Furniture. The Commission would like to have Architectural Review Board review the proposal as well as Board of Zoning Appeals. The Commission request that the rear lights, shine down to make sure it does not disturb the neighbors. The proposal will not have to return unless Architectural Review Board requires major changes. The motion was seconded by K. O'Rourke and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. The clerk announced the dates of the Architectural Review Board and Board of Zoning Appeals meetings. Mr. Schill questioned if they would have to wait until the sign package was approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals to go to the Board of Zoning and Development: The clerk indicated that the Board of Zoning and Development could review the proposal prior to the sign package being approved. She reviewed that once a date was set for the Board of Zoning and Development she would notify the applicant. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 6