11/01/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, _... . ` (1163.27 A). 2) A 26 sq. ft. variance for Znd wall sign-south elevation (rear) (code permits 100 sq. ft., applicant shows 126 sq. ft.), section (1163.27 C). 3) A 230 sq. ft. variance for maximum sq. ft. of signage per unit (code permits 120 sq. ft. applicant shows 350 sq. ft.), section (1163.24 C). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1163.27 A, 1163.27 C, and 1163.24 C. Note: The 230 sq. ft. variance requested above includes the 104 sq: ft. that should have been figured for the north (front) sign when only 25 sq. ft. was originally asked for and granted, and 126 sq. ft. for the proposed south (rear) sign. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered to Darrell Frye, with Bed, Bath & Beyond, and Skip Collins, with Direct Image (installers), who both came forward to review the request. Mr. Maloney indicated that they are back to resolve the sign situation on the building. He noticed that they removed the painted area like the board had asked them to: Mr. Frye indicated that they would like two signs on the building instead of one. There is a 26 ft. variance for the second wall sign and a 230 sq. ft. variance for the total area of signage. Basically because the building sits back and the receiving is in the back part of this door for visibility reasons. Mr. Kremzar questioned if there are doors that go in for the receiving. Mr. Frye replied yes, it is on that backside there. Mr. Maloney commented that they did a pretty good job resolving their issues and he had no further problems. The board agreed. Mr. Maloney called for a motion. W. Kremzar motioned to grant Bed, Bath & Beyond of 25975 Great Northern Plaza their request for variance 1123.12. Which consists of signage and that the following variances be granted: 1) A variance for 2°d wall sign-south elevation (rear) (code permits 1, applicant shows 2), section (1163.27 A). 2) A 26 sq. ft. variance for 2"d wall sign-south elevation (rear) (code permits 100 sq. ft., applicant shows 126 sq. ft.), section (1163.27 C). 3) A 230 sq. ft. variance for maximum sq. ft, of signage per unit (code permits 120 sq. ft. applicant shows 350 sq. ft.), section (1163.24 C). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1163.27 A, 1163.27 C, and 1163.24 C. Note: The 230 sq. ft. variance requested above includes the 104 sq. ft. that should have been figured for the north (front) sign when only 25 sq. ft. was originally asked for and granted, and 126 sq. ft. for the proposed south (rear) sign. The motion was seconded by T. Kelly and was unanimously approved. Granted 11/1/01. 5. AT &T: 25766 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of installing a 2°d wall sign. The following variance is requested: 1) A 2nd sign variance for an additional wall sign on the east elevation (code permits 1 per building unit, applicant shows 2), section (1163.27 A). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1163.27 A. _ Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. The oath was administered to Russ Kalina, the representative form Adams Signs, who came forwa,rd to review the request. Mr. Maloney questioned if AT&T needed a second sign on that building. Mr. Kalina replied yes. They are asking for a sign over the entrance door into AT&T. He passed around a couple of photographs showing the empty space above the door. They presently have a sign along Lorain Rd. on the wall. The sign that is up now is less square footage than actually is allowed in the anticipation of going with a sign over the door. They would just like to denote where you would actually go into the store. Mr. Kremzar questioned if it was going to be the same size as the front existing sign. Mr. 3