10/04/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

a I questioned when the applicants thought they would be building a garage. Mrs. Schreiber indicated that they would never put a gaxage in over the sewer lines. Each of the board members indicated that they felt the variances were warranted. J. Konold motioried to grant Dennis & Laura Schreiber of 5106 Lucydale Ave. their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of building a shed and that the following variances be granted: 1) A 5 ft. variance for rear yard setback (code requires 10 ft., applicant shows 5 ft.), section (1135.02 D-4). 2) A 30 square ft. variance for exceeding 2% of rear yard (code permits 66 sq. ft., applicant shows 96, sq. ft.), section (1135.02 I?-1). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-1 and 1135.02 D-4. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Granted 10- 4-01. 4. Richard Richardson• 23244 Woodview Dr. _ Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of an accessory structure (gazebo). The following variance is requested: 1) A 2-ft. plus or minus variance for height of accessory structure (code permits 12 ft., applicant shows 14 ft. plus or minus), section (113 5.02 D-1). Wluch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-l. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr., Rains, the contractor with Amish Country Builders came forward to be sworn in and review the applicant's request. Mr. Rains indicated that the owner would Iike a gazebo, which will need a platfonn because of the topography of his yard (rear yard slops). The owner would like to have a I2-foot gazebo, which is within code. The platform is needed to assure that the gazebo is level. It will put the height over the maximum 12 foot allowed. The chairman questioned if there were any questions from board members or audience members. No further comments were made. J. Konold motioned to grant Richard Richardson of 23244 Woodview Drive his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of an accessory structure (gazebo) and that the following variance be granted: 1) A 2-ft. plus or minus variance for heiglit of accessory structure (code permits 12 ft., applicant shows 14 ft. plus or minus). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-1. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Granted 10-4-01. 5. Paul & Jean Winslow; 24396 Maple Ridge Rd• Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of detached garage. The following variance is requested: ` 1) A 3-ft. variance for side lot line (code permits 5 ft., applicant shows 2 ft.), section (1135.02 D-4). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-4. Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. & Mrs. Winslow; the owners came forward to be sworn in and review their request. Mr. Winslow indicated that the current garage was very old and was rotting away. Currently the existing garage is 2-feet from the property line, he would like to build the new garage in the same spot. When the project first started only the concrete was going to be replaced, however it was found that the structure is in such poor condition that it also should be replaced. His yard is only 55-feet wide and today's code d'ictates that the garage be placed 5-feet from the side yard line. It was discussed that with the existing angle of the home and driveway placing the garage to code would be very difficult. Mr. Maloney questioned if the garage would have drainage. Mr. Winslow indicated that there would be downspouts however, he would like to just run the water into his yard not a drain. 1V1i-. Conway commented that the 3