10/04/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Chairman Maloney called all interested parties fonvard to review their request. Mr. Sray the owner came forward to be sworn in and review his request. Mr. Sray indicated that they :would like to replace the existing detach garage with a new one and be allowed to place it in the same spot. Mr. Maloney questioned if there would be gutters to handle the drainage. IVIr. Sray indicated that there would be gutters and it would be connected into the existing driveway drain. Mr. Kremzar questioned if the roof would have gutters on both sides. Mr. Sray indicated that the roof would be a gable roof and would run to one side to drain. No further comments were made. J. Konold inotioned to grant Anthony Sray of 23527 Alexander Road his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a detached garage and that the following variance be granted: 1) A 3-ft. variance for rear lot line (code permits 10 ft., applicant shows 7 ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-4. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Granted 10-4-01 8. George Hum6996 Chadbourne Dr. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of building a shed. The following variance is requested: 1) A 3 ft. variance for side lot line setback (code requires 5 ft., applicant shows 2 ft.), section (1135.02 D-4). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-4. Chairinan Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Hum the owner came forward to be sworn in and review his request. Mr. Hum indicated that the home in question is the first home he has ever owned and he was not aware that he needed a permit to build a shed. He built a shed and placed it 2 feet from the side property line. Both drains run to his side of the property so the water will go into his yard. Mr. Maloney requested that the applicant review what work had already done. Mr. Hum reviewed that the concrete slab was in place as well as the 4' x 4' posts. He assured the boar.d members that if he had known a permit was required for the shed he would have applied for one. Mr. Koberna believed that the owner would still be able to maintain the property around the shed. No further comments were made. T. Koberna motioned to grant George Hum of 6996 Chadbourne I3rive his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of building a shed and that the following variance be granted: 1) A 3 ft. variance for side lot line setback (code requires 5 ft.,' applicant shows 2 ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 D-4. The motion was seconded by J. Konold and unanimously approved. Granted 10-4-01 9. Jacob Moskalsky; 38 84 Canterburv Rd. Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of building a fence (6-ft.): The following variance is requested: 1) A 42 inch variance for fence exceeding 30 inch high on a corner lot in the required 50 ft. setback on the abutting street (code permits 30", applicant shows 72"), section (1135.02 F-Z). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, (1135.02 F-2). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. & Mrs. Moskalsky; the owners came forward to be sworn in and review their request. Mr. Moskalsky indicated that there was a typographical error as the fence is only 5-feet high, which is 60 inches not 72 inches as indicated on the notice. He would only need a 30-inch height variance not 42 inches. He further, questioned if he could replace the existing fence with new fencing. Mr. Conway asked for clarification from the applicant. Mrs. Moskalsky indicated that they will be adding on to the existina fence and would like to be allowed to replace the existing fence with new fencing to make it 5