Laserfiche WebLink
1. A 550 square foot variance for Total Square foot area (code permits 750 sq. ft., <br />applicant shows 1,300-sq. ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section, 1135.02 <br />C-1. <br />Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. The oath <br />was administered to NIr. Siegmeyer, the owner - Ms. Sindelar, Mrs. & Mr. Thompson, <br />and Mrs. Dudzik who are neighbors. Mr..Siegmeyer indicated that he was requesting an <br />addition to his garage. It would bee about 30 feet widtfi and 25 foot deep. Mr. Koberna <br />questioned why the addition was needed. W. Siegmeyer commented that he would like <br />to store his cars in the garages. Mr. Koberna inquired if the back of the existing garage <br />would be opened to get access. Mr. Siegmeyer reviewed that the new addition would <br />just be added and have its own entrance. Ms. Sindelar voiced that she is concerned about <br />the size of the garage. She questioned what it will be used for and suggested she did not <br />want to look at a SOfoot wall. Mr. Siegmeyer suggested he could put in a higher fence so <br />the neighbors did not have to see the wall. Mr. Thomson is concerned about the size of <br />the garage as well as what it will be used for. Ms. Sindelar suggested that there were all <br />lcinds of stuff behind the garage. Mr. Siegmeyer commented that the things would be <br />stored in the new garage. Ms. Dudzik is concerned about the use of the addition. She <br />would like to make sure that the garage is not going to be used for a business. Mr. <br />Siegmeyer assured the neighbors that the garage would not be used for a business. Mr. <br />Kremzar questioned the distance between the garage and the shed. W. Siegmeyer <br />believed it was 15 feet. Mr. Konold questioned what would be done with the existing <br />shed. Mr. Siegmeyer suggested that he could remove the shed if the board wanted, but <br />he would like to keep it. Ms. Sindelar questioned what material would be used. Mr. <br />Siegmeyer indicated that it would be vinyl siding. Mr. Maloney questioned if the <br />applicant would be willing to move the new garage to the north of the existing garage. <br />Mr. Siegmeyer believed the garage would be to close to his home. W. Koberna voiced a <br />concern as to why such a big garage was needed. Mr. Siegmeyer reiterated that he <br />wanted to park his cars in the garage and store his yard tools as well. He also does work <br />on his own cars and wants to park his cars indoors. Mr. Kremzar questioned if the size <br />could be smaller. Mr. Siegmeyer indicated that he would like to have at least the same <br />size as the existing garage. The neighbors are concern about the numbers of cars in the <br />yard and the things that are stored in the yard. Mr. Siegmeyer remarked that all the cars <br />will be in the garage and the yard would be cleaned up. Nir. Maloney made suggestions <br />on moving the garage. Mr. Koberna questioned if there had to be a hard surface <br />entrance. Mr. Rymarczyk reviewed that if a new drive was needed it must be concrete or <br />asphalt under the current code. Ms. Thompson is concerned about the size of the garage. <br />Ms. Sindelar is concerned about the buildings being different materials. Mr. Koberna <br />voiced a concern about using siding in lieu of brick, as it would look like it is just tacked <br />on. Mr. Siegmeyer believes that with it being in the back of the home it will not be seen. <br />Mr. Koberna suggested landscaping work also be done. Mr. Siegmeyer indicated that the <br />area will be cleaned up. The neighbors have children and are concerned about their <br />children's safety. <br />3