My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/10/2001 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission
>
07/10/2001 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:41 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 5:15:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2001
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/10/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
from people coming out of the pro shop. Mr. Bouschard reviewed what would take place once <br />the changes are made. Mr. Young commented that they are just trying to create a better <br />appearance for the city owned facility. <br />R. Tallon motion to approve Springvale Golf Club of 5871 Canterbury Road, which consists of <br />phase #2 (New Clubhouse). The proposal will go before the Architectura] Review Board and not <br />return unless there are major changes required. It will then go straight to Council. The motion <br />was seconded by K. O'Rourke and unanimously approved. Motion Cara-ied. <br />N. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />l. Olmsted-Kronz Lot Split & Consolidation Plat <br />Proposed splitting of Permanent Parcel # 234-26-011 (Block "E") at the Northwest corner of the <br />Mackenzie Rd. and Windsor Dr. intersection. <br />Chairman Tallon called all interested parties forward. Mr. Kronz came forward to review what <br />wouId be taking place. Three years ago he approached the City about purchasing this ]and as wel] <br />as the old wastewater treatment land. The City sold him 213 feet of the rear of lot 234-26-01 l, <br />which is 588 feet deep as well as the old wasfewater treatment lot. The reason he purchased the <br />land is to eventually build a home. He suggested that he is in the process of trying to purchase <br />part of the parcel of land owned by the McCoo]'s, which is in between the two pieces of land he <br />has purchased. Once the third piece of land is purchased he will combine all the land into one <br />parcel and build a home. The plan is to build one home for his family on the parcel. Mr. Tallon <br />questioned if the applicant currently owned any of the McCool land. He further questioned if the <br />applicant knew that the rear lot, which he purchased, was landlocked and even by purchasing this <br />piece of land it will still be landlocked. Both pieces of land that you have purchased are <br />considered unbuildable right now. Mr. Kronz indicated that he understood. Mr. Tallon <br />questioned if the applicant had already purchased the other two pieces of land. Mr. Kronz <br />indicated that he has an agreement with the City and the money is in escrow until the City splits <br />the 213 feet of land from parcel 234-26-01 l. Mr. Tallon cornmented that the board was not in <br />the habit of creating unbuildable lots. However, Mr. Kronz has purchased one unbuildable lot to <br />the south and is purchasing another portion of an unbuildable lot. .The unbuildable lot before this <br />board tonight also has a right-of-way for sewers owned by the City, which can not be built on. <br />Mr. Tallon asked the Assistant Law Director to clarify the issue for the audience. Mr. Dubelko <br />indicated that it was his understanding that the city entered into a contract with Mr. Kronz, which <br />was approved by City Council and signed by the Mayor June 21, 2000. The deed is in escrow and <br />the Planning Commission really does not have any discretion in the matter, as they are a <br />recoinmending body to Council, which has already approved this sale. It creates two lots that are <br />presently unbuildable; the new owner is taking them with that understanding. He has no access to <br />the rear parcel, which renders it unbuildable, and the front parcel is unbuildable because of its <br />geographical dimensions and the easement that runs across it. Mr. Kronz is purchasing this parcel <br />with knowledge from the City that it can not be built upon unless he acquires back land from the <br />McCool family. Mr. Kronz answered "that is correct". Mr. Dubelko suggested that this has been <br />going on for a year due to unforeseen circumstances. Make no mistake this is a done deal. City <br />Council has already sold this land. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned who would own parcel B. Mr. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.