My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/20/2002 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2002
>
2002 Architectural Review Board
>
11/20/2002 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:48:47 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 5:33:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2002
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
11/20/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
+ withdrawal the motion to approve and motioned to tabAe I)aniel E. Margulies (Pepper Joe's <br />Restaurant) of 24532 Lorain Road. 'Y'hey are to submit new plans showing the Architectural <br />12eview Boards recommendations. B. Zergott seconded the motion, which was unanimously <br />approved. Proposal Tabled <br />2. Chi otle Mexican GrillLorain Road PP# 235-27-001 <br />Proposal consists of construction of a new building to house Chipotle Mexican Grill, site <br />improvements and sign package. Note: Variances are required. Planning Commission referred <br />this to Architectural Review Board 11-12-02. <br />Chairman Zergott called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Ms. Obert, <br />Architectural intern and Mr. Wilson the Architect for Chipotle came forward to present their <br />proposal. <br />Applicant's proposai: Ms. Obert the new building will be located in the northwest corner of <br />Great Northern Mall. The signage has been revised at the request of the Planning Commission. <br />The galvanized fagade matches the exterior of the walk in cooler. 1VIr. VVilson indicated that the <br />dumpster enclosure has been changed to a brick enclosure at the request of Planning Commission. <br />Ms. Obert remarked that the brick and color palette of all the Chipotle buildings are the same but <br />each building design is unique unto itself. The amount of variances required for the signage has <br />been reduced. Mr. 13ymarczyk reviewed that the applicants will need six variances for the <br />signage. 1VIs. Obert felt that as this was a new restaurant in this area signage and visibility is very <br />important. The galvanized entry fin, which houses the pepper, is thought of as more of an <br />architectural element then a sign. 1VIr. Yager commented that he thought a cutout with a <br />suspended pepper and lights highlighting the pepper would look cool. Ms. Obert indicated that <br />the parapet would hide the rooftop units from view on all sides of the building. There is external <br />lights planned that could accent the pepper so they will look into a punch-out pepper. <br />Board members questeores & eomments: Mr. Yager suggested pushing the envelope by using <br />more metal and strong lights on the entrance. The brick will help you receive approval from the <br />City, as we always like to see brick. He suggested making the glass window sections on the north <br />side of the building open. Mr. VVilson suggested that Chipotle owners do want a certain amount <br />of subtlety so he is hesitant to make to many changes. Chipotle designers were very involved in <br />the final design for this site. Ms. Schulz suggested that the entrance does not go with the rest of <br />the building, which is a square box. 1VIr. Yager suggested metal soffit could bring more of the <br />inside outside. He would also ]ike to see perforated metal in the bands. 1VIs. Schulz would like to <br />see some type of inetal band above the lights on north side or expand the amount of inetal at the <br />main entrance. There was discussion as to what is and is not considered signage on a building. <br />There was also discussion regarding exploring more dynamic designs for the building. 1VIs. <br />Schulz questioned the type of material used for the patio fencing, the height of the fence and if <br />the foundation of patio would be concrete; mosaic or textured. 1VIr. Wilson indicated that the <br />patio would be concrete that that is scored. The railing is from a national account Chipotle works <br />with and the fence is a dipped heavy wire mesh that does not rust. <br />Background of Chipotle conception: Mr. Wilson reviewed that the founder of the Chipotle <br />franchise was a classically trained chief. He had worked in many of the finer restaurants overseas <br />and in California and wanted to provide .good food at a reasonable price. The buildings are <br />designed so the patrons get good food quickly and get back to what they are doing. The quality of <br />food is paramount to the owner. Therefore, the menu is very simple and limited but made to <br />order. The inside of the building layout is designed so the patrons get to see what a chief sees in a <br />kitchen. He was not an architect however he requested that the outside of the restaurants carry the <br />same theme as the inside of the restaurant. That is why there are a lot of raw industrial material is <br />used on the outside of the buildings. <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.