06/06/2002 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

if the new shed will be put where the current one is. Mrs. Lindsey said it will be approximately 22 ft. from the left side of the property. Mr. Lindsey said it will come out another 2 ft. and 4 ft. over. Mrs. Lindsey said they have an attached garage and have to keep combustible material in there because they have no other means of storage, which is not safe. Mr. Kremzar asked what would happen if the electrical wires came down. Mr. Kelly said he is concerned about that as well. He said 2 ft. is too olose to any type of utility and accessibility. He said they would need a minimum of 4-6 ft. Mrs. Sergi asked if they would consider moving it into the 22 ft. and move it back out from the fence further, 5 ft. from the fence, but further from the house. Mrs. L,indsey said it is narrower there. The depth they are talking about is behind the garage. Mrs. Sergi asked if their goal is to preserve more of their yard. Mrs. Lindsey indicated that is correct, and added that the yard is only 25 ft. deep. Mrs. Sergi said if they move the shed more toward the corner, they would still have a large part of yard. They reviewed the plans further. The board and applicants negotiated moving the shed a bit. Mr. Kremzar reminded them of the need for 3 votes. He asked if moving the shed 5-ft. off of each property line would be acceptable. W. Kremzar made a motion to grant Clay Lindsey, 4555 Ranchview Dr., the request for variance, (1123.12), which consists of replacing old shed with a new and larger shed, and that the variances be granted as amended: 1). A 5 ft. variance for erecting a shed closer to the rear property line than ordinance permits (code requires 10', applicant shows 5'), section (1135.02 (d)(4)). The shed to be moved to the left rear corner 5 ft. in from the side and back. 2). A 43 square foot variance for a shed larger than 2% of rear yard area (code permits 53 square ft., applicant shows 96 square ft.), section (1135.02 (d)(1)). Note: New shed will replace old smaller shed. Required 10' from rear line fence will put shed in middle of yard. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135:02 (d)(4)), and (1135.02 (d)(1)). The motion was seconded by N. Sergi and unanimously approved. Variances Granted as amended. 5). Dennis and Kathy Solomon; 28501 Willet Rd.; (WRD-1) . Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of addition to house. The following variances are requested: A special permit to add to a non-conforming building (1165.02) Note: With existing sunroom (10 x 15) dwelling is only 40 feet from rear line now. 1. A 15 foot variance for a residential dwelling too close to rear property line (code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 35 ft.), section (1135.08 (a)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1165.02), (1135.08 (a)). This request has been tabled at the request of the applicant until the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting on July 10, 2002. 6). Gerald Wisniewski; 5560 Columbia Rd.; (WRD-4) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of building a gazebo in rear yard on existing pool deck. The following variance is requested: _ 1. A 4 foot, 3 and 3/4 inch variance for an accessory building higher than code permits (code permits 12 ft., applicant shows 16 ft, 3 and 3/4 inches). Note: Existing pool deck is 2'2" above grade. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d)(3)). Vice Chairman Kremzar called all interested parties forward to Teview the request. Mr. Gerald Wisniewski came forward to be sworn in. He indicated they are putting a gazebo on an existing deck. It will need a height variance. They referred to the drawings. Mr. Wisniewski confirmed the figures given to the board. 4