05/02/2002 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?A, 1. A 120 square foot variance for erecting a shed larger than the code allows (code petmits 200 . square feet, applicant shows 320 square feet), section (1135.02 (d)(1)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (i 135.02 (d)(1)). The motion was seconded by J. Konold. Roll call on the motion; N. Sergi, and J. Konold "yes", T. Kelly, W. Kremzar and J. Maloney "no", Variance Denied. The applicant requested the board reconsider the rejection as his yard is 635 feet deep and the width in the rear is 82 feet. He has 1.92 acres of Iand and none af his neighbors object to the size of shed he has requested. Mr. O'Malley explained what would need to take place if the board wanted to reconsider the motion. J. Maloney motioned to reconsider Emil Morad Jr. request. The motion was seconded by J. Konold. Roll call on the motion; T. Kelly "no", N. Sergi, J. Konold, W. Kremzar and J. Maloney "yes". Motion to reconsider approved. N. Sergi motioned to grant Emil M. Morad, Jr. of 5536 Columbia Road his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of erecting a shed and that the following variance is granted: 1. A 120 square fvot variance for erecting a shed larger tha.n the code allows (code permits 200 square feet, applicant shows 320 square feet), section (1135.02 (d)(1)). Which is in violation of 4rd. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d)(1)). The motion was seconded by J. Konold. Roll call on the motion; N. Sergi, J. Konold W. Kremzar and J. Maloney "yes", T. Kelly, "no", Variance Granted. Note: W. Maloney and Mr. Kremzar commented that the only reason they reconsidered their votes is due to the fact that the applicants land is 1.92 acres. Mr. Kelly remarked that his concern is that there is already a green hause on the site. 4. - William & Ann Scullin; 4108 Brendan Lane: (WRD 4) Request for va.riance (1123.12). The proposal consists of erecting a fence. The following variances are requested: 1. A 45 foot variance for erecting a fence within neighbors front setback on a corner lot (code requires 50 feet, applicant shows 5 feet), section (1135.02 (fl(1)). 2. A 30 inch variance for a fence higher than 30 inches in a neighbors front setback on a corner lot (code pernuts 30applicant shows 60"), section (1135,02 (f)(1)). 3. A variance for a fence less than 500/o open in a neighbors front setback an a corner lot (code permits 50% open, applicant shows less than 50% open), section (1135.02 (fl(1)). Note: Fence will replace tall hedges which were too much for homeowner to maintain and have been removed. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (fl(1)). Chaitman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. & Mrs. Scullin came farward to be sworn in and address their request. Mr. Scullin indicated that they would like to erect a£ence on their property to replace the 6-foot high bushes that were removed _ and far privacy. At one point they had bushes that were 6-feet ta11 however they were removed because it became to hard for Mr. Scullin to maintain. Mr. Maloney questioned how far iiack the fence would run. Mr. Scullin indicated that the fence would run 5-feet in from the sidewalk to the back property until it meets up with the existing fence. Mrs. Sergi questioned what type of fence would be erected. Mr. Scullin remarked that the fence style would be a shadow box style. Mr. Maloney commented that Mr. & Mrs. Scullin submitted a letter signed by S of their neighbars indicating they had no objection to the Scullins variance request. Mrs. Sergi questioned if the sidewalk was block by the bushes that were removed, as she is concemed for the safety of cluldren not being seen by ca.rs coming from the rear neighbors driveway. W. Scullin voiced that there had never been a problem when the bushes were in place. The board wauld like to see the a