06/25/2002 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

> sidewalks will be continued and some will be replaced. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned if the existina trees are left on the site, could all the mounds be put in place. Mr. Lydon indicated that the trees on the Clague Road side are about 40-feet back and the mounds in front of them would be put in place. However, if the ground around the bigger trees in the back of the lot is altered too much the trees will be damaged. Therefore, that area would remain natural forest. This would become a trade-off for the green space. Mr. Spalding questioned if there was a light cut of the fixtures. Mr. Lydon indicated that the lights would be a bronze shoebox fixture. Mr. Rymarczyk questioned if the board would be referring the applicants to the Architectural Review Board to review the landscaping plans. Mr. Spalding indicated that the board would forward the proposal to the Architectural Review Board. W. Spalding motion to approve Fairview Corporate Center (Zeremba Mgmt.); PP# 237-23-023, 025, 037, 041, 049 which consists of parking and landscaping plans proposed for the North Olmsted portion of the Fairview Office Park development. The proposal will go before the Architectural Review Board for their review and approval. The forester is to review the tree situation. Mrs. O'Rourke stated that if the. trees were not worth saving, she would prefer the mounding, grass, and park like setting on the site. J. Lasko seconded the motion. Note: In the framing of the motion Mr. O'Malley questioned if the board included in their motion the splitting of the lot, deed restrictions, and variances required. Mr. Spalding indicated that it was not mentioned in the proposal and questioned if they should be added to the Board's motion. Mr. O'Malley suggested it would be appropriate to refer as lots are being split. Making the approval conditional upon the applicant's willingness to deed the property to the City of North Olmsted. Deed restrictions imposed on the land and then deeding the land back to the property owner. The City would have to be involved with property transaction. Mr. Lasko suggested that those issues were addressed and agreed to by the applicants in their past meetings. He questioned if their motion could just incorporate those accommodations that were agreed to at the past meetings. Mr. O'Malley indicated that for the purpose of the clerk and for the minutes of this meeting that it be reviewed by the City Council to make sure that down the line each of the appropriate conditions are listed out. Mr. Lydon suggested tfiat their attorriey created a deed for the City o Nort Olmsted. It was reviewed and there were some questions and then the whole process started all over. Mr. Spalding stated there would be an addendum to the motion. This approval is contingent upon the developer complying with the previous approvals given by the Planning Commission in June of 2000. At which time the City and the Developer discussed deed restrictions and numerous variances required by the developer. The Planning Commission will send this proposal to the Board of Zoning Appeals and recommend that the variances required be approved. J. Lasko again seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. 1Vlotion Care-ied. The clerk announced that the proposal would go before the Board of Zoning Appeals on July 10, 2002. The Architectural Review Board will review the proposal on July 17, 2002, at 5:30 p.m. and that no notices would be released for the Architectural Review Board meeting. 4. Gasoline Service Station (JGD Associates); 25199 Lorain Road: Proposal consists of renovation of existing store exterior and pump station canopy. Acting Chairman Spalding called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Mr. Reiman, the attorney for True North, Mr. Dzwonczyk and Mr. Flury with JGD Associates Engineers, came forward to review the proposal. Mr. Reiman indicated the station to be discussed is located at the intersection of Lorain and Great Northern Blvd. The red line around the pump station canopy will not be illuminated. However, they are requesting that the Shell sign be illuminated. The station itself is not a True North station, it is a Shell station and that is why there is a difference between the color schemes. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned why someone would choose 4