My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/08/2002 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2002
>
2002 Landmarks Commission
>
04/08/2002 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:09 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 6:16:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2002
Board Name
Landmarks Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
4/8/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of << site and any improvements on it and the possible effects on matching funds. Mr. Lang said, in <br />ans•wer to Mr. Barker's question, many of the structures that are on the National Register have both <br />exterior and interior alterations and improvements paid for by government expense through tax <br />doll.ars; none of which effect the National Register. Mrs. Lord pointed out the Old Town Hall is on <br />the National Register. She said the exterior ramp is obviously an addition and there have been <br />sigruficant changes on the interior. Mrs. Lord said when talking about a land-marked building, they <br />mu;;t be certain they are talking the same language. In their ordinance they have the right to landmark <br />a bixilding. It is a local decision. She asked if the city should perhaps go for the National Register, <br />which is a whole different plan. The two do not need to be done together. The National Register <br />doesn't care if it's land-marked. The Commission has the right to do a land-marking designation. In <br />the past, with the three buildings they land-marked, they took the high road and the buildings were all <br />city or church owned. They weren't dealing with private ownership. Mrs. Lord said this is again a <br />city building, so the city must be involved every step of the way. When they have gone through the <br />process before, they gathered all the information and then a resolution was developed and it went <br />through Gouncil. That is what must happen. She added there are two signs on the Old Town Hall. <br />OnE; is a landmark sign, and the other a National Register sign. The landmark sign was locally made. <br />The:y wrote the other signs in the community and then sent them to Columbus to be produced. No <br />one came back and said there was a problem with it. It was our research. Mrs. VanAuken suggested <br />the Board do the local landmark and then look at the National Register later on. Mrs. Lord indicated <br />that: could be done, but it is not related to the brown sign, which is the state designation. W. Lang <br />suggested that the research be expedited into a local landmark and then examine the possibility of <br />geti:ing a marker. He mentioned the flyer from the bicentennial commission and the meeting at <br />Faiiview Library with 7erinifer Maringo. They are looking for ideas from local communities on what <br />can be done to promote those communities as part of the bicentennial. Mr. Lang added that he spoke <br />with Ms. 1Vlaringo about two years ago. Mr. Lang told her he believes North Olmsted has more of <br />those brown signs than any other suburb in Cleveland. She was not aware that North Olmsted had <br />any because it was not on the list. A walking tour was mentioned in their literature. There is the <br />National Trust conference in October and they are looking for places to go. The conference may <br />include sight-seeing tours. Mr. Lang pointed out North Olmsted has the first municipal bus line in <br />Ohio, the Ox Cart Library and so many other things that are unique in this area to present to the <br />National Trust in October. He said if the Board can get something done to Springvale now, it's one <br />more thing to add to the list of places to see and visit. Mrs. VanAuken expressed uncertainty as to <br />whE;ther or not they could get a sign in time from the bicentennial commission. She suggested the <br />Board do something on its own. Mrs. Lord summarized and said they should move forward quickly. <br />It seems as if the local landmarks ordinance would be the first step. Mrs. O'Rourke pointed out she <br />heard the golf course should be finished by Memorial Day. She said the land-marking could be part <br />of their re-opening ceremony. Mrs. VanAuken said as long as they are still working on it, they could <br />do it on the 4`i' of July or. during homecomirig, or during the actual bicentennial celebrations. Mrs. <br />Lord mentioned that Springvale opened in 1931. She suggested a couple of people sit down to write <br />a history statement that the Board can use as a backup for the whole complex. Mrs. Davis indicated <br />it uias actually in the 1920's that it was first designed and built. It was sold sometime during the <br />depression. She gave some further history of the facility. 1V1rs. O'Rourke said she heard that the <br />Noith Olmsted Golf Course might be the oldest course. Mrs. Davis indicated there are pieces of the <br />Noith Olmsted course that are old, but they were part of Springvale at one time. Mrs. Lord <br />meirtioned that before the depression there had been a plan to build houses around the golf course. <br />Mr;>. O'Rourke pointed out that a representative from the North Olmsted Golf Association touted the <br />North Olmsted Golf Course as the oldest course when he gave his presentation to the Planning <br />Commission. He said the new museum and offices are located on one of the oldest golf courses in the <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.