08/07/2003 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The following variances are requested: 1. A 7-foot candle variance for maximum illumination levels (code permits 4 ft. candles, applicant shows 11 ft. candles), section (1161.12 (c)). 2. A 175 foot variance for distance of pole to north property line (code requires 180 ft., applicant shows 5 ft.), section (1161.12 (e)). 3. A 129 foot variance for distance of poles to east property line (code requires 180 ft., applicant shows 51 ft.), section (1161.12 (e)). 4. A 92 foot variance for distance of poles to south property line (code requires 180 ft., applicant shows 88 ft.), section (1161.12 (e)). 5. A 99 foot variance for distance of pole to west property line (code requires 180 ft., applicant shows 81 ft.), section (1161.12 (e)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1161.12 (c)), and (1161.12 (e)). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Saleet the architect came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. Saleet reviewed that they would like to have lights at 30 feet high to match the exiting lights in the area. Planning Commission request that they have the 30-foot light poles to match the existing neighbors. They will have 6 double shoe box lights. Four variances are needed due to the placement of the lights. They are trying to reach the minimum at the lot line but it is a little over. They have reduced the glare and there will be cutoffs on the lights as required. Mr. Dubelko commented that he had discussed the request with Mr. O'Malley who has been involved with the applicants. He voiced that the applicants are trying to do the best they could to comply to the code and satisfy the city. N. Sergi motion to approve Remington College of 26350 Great Northern 5hopping Center their request for variance (1123.12) which consists of parking lot lighting and that the following variances are granted: 1. A 7-foot candle variance for maximum illumination levels (code permits 4 ft. candles, applicant shows 11 ft. candles), section (1161.12 (c)). 2. A 175 foot variance for distance of pole to north property line (code requires 180 ft., applicant shows 5 ft.), section (1161.12 (e)). 3. A 129 foot variance for distance of poles to east property line (code requires 180 ft., applicant shows 51 ft.), section (1161.12 (e)). 4. A 92 foot variance for distance of poles to south property line (code requires 180 ft., applicant shows 88 ft.), section (1161.12 (e)). 5. A 99 foot variance for distance of pole to west property line (code requires 180 ft., applicant shows 81 ft.), section (1161.12 (e)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1161.12 (c)), and (1161.12 (e)). W. Kremzar seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Variances Granted Vitamin Shoppe; 26532 Lorain Road, WRD 1: Request for variance (1123:12). The proposal consists of additional signage The following variances are requested: 1. A variance for a second wall sign on building, (code permits 1, applicant shows 2), section (1163.27 (a)). 2. A 59.85 square foot variance for total square footage of signage on building, (code permits 100 sq. ft, applicant shows 159.85 sq. ft), section (1163.24 (b)). 3. A 70.75 square foot variance for additional total square footage of signage on lot, (code permits 168.75 sq. ft, applicant shows 626.15 sq. ft), section (1163.24 (a)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections, (1163.27 (a)), (1163.24 (b)), and (1163.24 (a)).