06/05/2003 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

board suggested reconfiguring the addition so not, as much yard is lost. A lengthy discussion took place regarding the placement of the addition and a letter that was received by an abutting neighbor. After the discussion between the applicants, commissioners, and neighbors, the applicant decided to be tabled and rethink their plans. N. Sergi motioned to table William & Laura Kozel of 24853 Randall Drive their request for variance (1123.12) which consists of a 30' x 13' addition and applicants will return within 90 days. W. Kremzar seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Tabled 8). Thomas & Diane Rustifo, 28043 Edgepark Drive, WRD 1 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a 3 season room. The following variance is requested: l. A 13 foot variance for rear yard requirements (code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 37 ft.) Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.08 (a)). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Rustifo, the owner and Mr. Mozina, the builder each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. The applicant would like a 14' x 14' 3-season room built, to enjoy their backyard. The applicant did not feel that his request would affect any neighbors, as the property, which abuts his, is a wooded area that is owned by the city. J. Konold motioned to grant Thomas & Diane Rustifo of 28043 Edgepark Drive their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a 3 season room and that the following variance is granted: A 13 foot variance for rear yard requirements (code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 37 ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.08 (a)). N. Sergi seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted 9). Karl Kubb, 6720 Maplehurst, WRD 3 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a garage replacement. The following variance is requested: 1. A 2 foot variance for side lot line set back (code requires 5 ft., applicant shows 3 ft.) 2. A 5 foot variance for rear lot line set back (code requires 10 ft., applicant shows 5 ft.) Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d)(4)). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Kubb the owner came forward to be sworn in and address the request. The applicant would like to replace his existing garage with a new one a little larger. The Commission questioned if the lot could accommodate a garage the size requested and the applicant explained that his lot was an odd shape. The commission requested that downspouts be placed on the garage. The applicant agreed to have downspouts that drain to the swell on the garage. W. Kremzar motioned to grant Karl Kubb of 6720 Maplehurst his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a garage replacement and that the following variances are granted: 1. A 2 foot variance for side lot line set back (code requires 5 ft., applicant shows 3 ft.) 2. A 5 foot variance for rear lot line set back (code requires 10 ft., applicant shows 5 ft.) Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d)(4)). T. Kelly seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted 10). Arthur Bibbs, 23472 Westchester, WRD 2 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new front porch. The following variance is requested: 4