11/25/2003 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The existing parcel has split zoning. The three proposed parcels, 70 feet by 155 feet fronting Bradley Road, will conform to the area, depth and lot width requirements of the Zoning Code. These parcels will lie wholly within the B Residence, Single Zone. The remaining portion of Permanent Parcel Number 233-07-009 will not conform to the lot width requirements of the Zoning Code. The required lot width is 70 feet for B Residence, Single zoning, and the actual width will be approximately 32 feet. The remaining portion of Permanent Parcel Number 233-07-009 will conform to the area and depth requirements of the Zoning Code. Chairman Koeth called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Mr. Cotoski the Engineer for the site came forward to address the proposal. Applicant's. proposal: 1VIr. Cotoski suggested that they would like to have three lots that meet the code and be granted a variance for the fourth parcel, which will not meet the frontage requirement. The fourth parcel will be 3.9 acres and eventually it will be developed as multi-family. He reviewed the zoning and lots around the site. Mr. Spalding questioned the plans for the rear lot. Mr. Cotoski was not sure what would be done with the rear lot. Mr.Yager questioned what the requirement for a multi-family lot would be. Mr. Cotoski felt that a drive for the rear lot would be 24-feet wide. Mr. Yager reviewed that 32-feet was not wide enough for easements, and landscaping that will be required. Mr. Spalding suggested only having two residential lots and one large multi-family lot not three and one. Mr. Hreha and Mrs. Hoff-Smith suggested tabling the plan and having the owner rework the lots. Mr. Yager suggested that if the applicant only breaks off two residential lots and then have the third lot be to code they would not require a variance. Mr. Cotoski indicated that he is not in a position to speak for the owners. Itesidents Comments: Ms. Wargo indicated that she wanted access to use the condo roads and the condos will not permit use of their road. Mr. McCaskey asked what would be done with the rear lot. He is adding an addition to his home and he is concerned what will be done. The zoning is light industry so there is a concern as to what will be done to the rear of the lot. Mr. Yager suggested that the neighbors get a card from the engineer so they could meet with the owners before the applicants return. Ms. Andrews is glad to hear what has taken place at this meeting. She felt that as they were just seeing the plan for the first time and what is taking place to the rear lot is not really clear she would like the applicant to state what will be done so there is a clear understanding by everyone. She would like to see the issue tabled. R. Koeth motion to table Lot Split Plat for Barton Road Permanent Parcel Number 233-07- 009, until the developer comes up with a new plan. S. Hoff-Smith seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. V. COMMUMCATIONS: Letter from K. Wenger, AICP, Citv Planning Director regarding Steering Committee appointee• Mr. Koeth indicated that Planning Commission needed to appoint 3 members to the steering committee. Mr. Koeth indicated that Mr. Hreha, Mrs. Hoff-Smith and Mr. Spalding would represent the Planning Commission on the steering committee. 17