Laserfiche WebLink
o. <br />P. Barker motion to grant Mr. Dunlap of 26550 Butternut Ridge Road his request for a <br />certificate of appropriateness to place vinyl siding on the existing garage only. B. Lord <br />seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Mr. Lang read the following <br />wording for the certificate: following permit request to install submitted vinyl siding to <br />garage behind home at 26550 Butternut Ridge Road. <br />The Law department was asked to look into possibilities of applicants returning if the <br />commission is limited to members being present. <br />Mr. & Mrs Mancuso of 27260 Butternut Ridge Road: <br />Request for certificate of appropriateness to install deck and fencing. <br />Mr. Lang reviewed that a year earlier Mrs. Mancuso was before the commission with drawings <br />of an addition over the garage. At a meeting last year there was discussion of the addition of a <br />deck. Mrs. Mancuso suggested that the Building Department stated that they had the certificate <br />of appropriateness for the deck but they have nothing in the file for it. She passed out pictures <br />showing the existing fences that are along their property lines. They would like to build a vinyl <br />wood like deck to come out 10 to 12 feet off the back of the home and 10-feet wide with a <br />couple of steps down. The commission inquired if any trees would be removed to place the <br />fence. Mrs. Mancuso would not know who owned the trees until the survey is completed. The <br />Law Department advised the applicant that she may not place a fence in front of any existing <br />fences she would have to remove the existing fence sections or apply for a variance. Mrs. <br />Mancuso indicated that the neighbor who owns the red fence agreed to remove her fence. The <br />board questioned if the applicant received the packet that was sent to her which included a check <br />list and other documents advising what the commission required. Mrs. Mancuso indicated that <br />she did get the packet. The board did not receive the check-off sheet or any other documents <br />regarding the deck or fence placement. The Law department advised that when the applicant <br />goes before the building department to request a permit for the fence and deck the building <br />department will review what is required to issue a permit. The board thanked the applicant for <br />coming and indicated that they looked forward to seeing her once she submits her plans to the <br />building department for permits. <br />Mr. & Mrs. Timms 25527 Butternut lZid2e 12oad: <br />Request for certificate of appropriateness to construct a detached garage 60' x 40' x 10' high. <br />Mr. Timms indicated that currently there is a dilapidated shed in the yard which will be removed <br />and he would like to build a three car garage to store his vehicles and personal tools for his <br />hobby. Lengthy discussion took place on the size and height of the proposed garage as well as <br />the proposed gravel driveway. The garage would not be visible from the street. The applicant <br />has a couple of trees that are quite old on the lot which will be kept. He reviewed that the home <br />was built in 1952 and he had the windows replaced in the house less than a month earlier. The <br />board indicated that the windows and man doors on the garage should have molding not just <br />siding to the edges. Mr. Gross a neighbor to the east voiced that they could not see the garage. <br />Mr. Crabs, the neighbor to the south west area of the lot voiced that he is concerned that the <br />applicant removed trees which were not dead and did not go through the city forester for <br />permission to remove the trees. He did not believe the dimensions shown on the plans were <br />correct. The board asked if Mr. Crabs would object to the garage if it was moved forward. Mr. <br />2