08/05/2004 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3. A 2 foot variance for a shed too close to a side yard property line, (code requires 5', applicant shows 3'), section (1135.02 D2). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (D1) &(DZ)). Note: Rear yard = 71'x 70' = 4970 X.02% 99.4 allowed Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to be sworn in and, review the request. Ms. Mustafa the owner and Mr. Baskin, a neighbor each came forward to be sworn in and address the proposal. Mr. Baskin reviewed that the rear neighbors would not see the shed. The board voiced that the engineering department submitted a letter regarding the easements on the sides and rear of the land. Mr. Baskin indicated that the owners have a large family and need to store things. The board voiced thought the shed should be smaller. Ms. Mustafa voiced that they would put gutters to drain the water but they need to store garage equipment. She indicated that air conditioner was put in the attic and now everything is in the garage and can not go back in the attic. They now need storage ar;,a to keep items secured. The board voiced that they would prefer a 12 x 12 shed. Mr. Maloney reviewed a letter from neighbor voicing that the shed is quite large. The neighbor in his letter voiced that there is drainage problems and this would increase the problem. The neighbor would like to see the shed placed on the other side of the lot. The board reviewed that the shed is to be placed to code and then agree to a 12 x 12 shed to which would need a 45 square foot variance. J. Maloney moved to grant Muna Mustafa.of 6167 Park Ridge Drive her request for variance (1123.12), which consists of erecting a shed and that the following variance as amended is granted: A 45 square foot variance for a 12 x 12 shed which is to be placed 5 feet off the side yard line and 10 feet off the rear property line. (cocie permits 99 sq. ft., applicant shows 144 sq. ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (D1). W. Kremzar seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. 10. Baldo & Jennifer Camnana; 5819 Barton Road: WRD 3 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of installing a fence. The following variances are requested: 1. A 50 foot variance for a fence within neighbors 50 foot front yard setback on a corner lot, (code permits 0, applicant shows 50', section (1135.02 172). 2. A 42 inr,h variance for a fence in 50 foot front yard setback higher than code allows, (code permits 30", applicant shows 72"), section (1135.02 Fl). 3. A variance for a fence less than 50% open in a 50 foot:front setback, (code requires 50% open, applicant shows solid), section (1135.02 F1). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (F1) &(F2)). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to be sworn in and review the request. Mr. & Mrs. Campana the owners each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. The applicants are very concerned for the safety of their children and dog. The amount of traffic is dangerous. The board voiced that they witnessed the high volume of traffic and agreed for safety reasons a fence was needed. N. Sergi moved to grant Baldo & Jennifer Campana of 5819 Barton Road their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of installing a fence and that the following variances are granted: 1. A 50 faot variance for a fence within neighbors 50 foot front yard setback on a corner lot, (code permits 0, applicant shows 50', section (1135.02 F2). 6