Laserfiche WebLink
Recreation Commission Meeting <br />March 1, 2004 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Kelley asked for any comments. Mr. Baxter said he reviewed the minutes from last month <br />and could not figure out who was paying for the water. Mr. Kelley replied that NOSO would pay <br />for the water, but that's in litigation back and forth as to liability as to what is understood now. <br />What it came down to over the past three months is that at every avenue, something else gets <br />thrown at the proposal. At every other meeting, it seemed to Mr. Kelley that NOSO has gone out <br />of its way to pay for different things. The first thing that came up against it was: who's paying <br />for the water? NOSO came back and said it would. Who's paying for the sprinkler? NOSO came <br />back and said it would pay for the sprinkler. Remembering this is City property, Councilman <br />Limpert made Mr. Kelley aware that the property was purchased when St. John West Shore <br />Hospital was being thought of for that property - what kind of upgrades have been done to the <br />property over the years? This is something that has been needed for years. The City has never <br />been able to water the fields. NOSO has been asking for a water line for ten years that Mr. Kelley <br />knew. Here is an opportunity to put the water line in and for an outside source to run a <br />tournament and upgrade the fields for the City. If Friedel leaves in a year, what is the City left <br />with? Mr. Limpert said that the worst case scenario would be: $40,000 drinking fountains. Mr. <br />Kelley countered that that seems very high to him. $40,000 includes shooting the grades, a <br />trencher with PVC piping, making connections, run with it, stop, make the T. If it takes a week, <br />Mr. Kelley would be surprised; he does not see it running $40,000. Mr. Kelley said it came out of <br />the Committee unanimously to go forward with the project, gone to Council, and it keeps coming <br />back with obstacles in the way. There is a time frame. Mr. Miller said that it, with the budget the <br />way it is, it's hard to justify $40,000 for a two-week profit-making camp and then leave. For <br />example, the City didn't replace a dispatcher, and the City is short a corrections officer. When <br />one thinks about these things vs. a water line for a two-week camp, one can question that. <br />Council wants to see this done, but wants to have from this camp that stands to profit <br />considerably something long-term benefiting the community. Some talked five years, and the City <br />and NOSO came down to three years. Mr. Jesse stated that it's not a dead issues; that it's got <br />some holes in the road and the two sides are trying to get over them. There's been a lot of <br />progress since last week. When it comes time, there will be a strong presentation to be made. <br />Some legislation was anticipated to be passed for Wednesday night if need be. The votes are <br />there. The commitment must be there. Mr. Jesse hopes that, within the next few days, there will <br />be an agreed recommendation for Committee next week. In his original meeting with Mr. Friedel, <br />thth <br />Mr. Jesse said that the best case scenario would be the 16 or 17 of March and reiterated that at <br />the Commission meeting. Mr. Hatfield said that, besides Brad's (Friedel's) camp, NOSO has been <br />running a soccer tournament for the last 30 years, bringing revenue into the City in taxes. <br />Complexes are being built and competition is greater now for having these tournaments and <br />tracking teams and, if the City can make its fields better, it will help in that regard as well. Mr. <br />Jesse said that that City is considering all facets and dimensions of this project and has also <br />developed a very comprehensive soccer program and instruction schedule over the last 20 years, <br />meeting far more than the Recreation Department ever envisioned. NOSO's support and funding <br />is very much appreciated. <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />